Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21987387›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2011

Nonrandom gene loss from the Drosophila miranda neo-Y chromosome.

Vera B Kaiser, Qi Zhou, Doris Bachtrog

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sex Chromosome Evolution: Hallmarks and Question Marks.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The timing of genetic degeneration of sex chromosomes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Sequence analysis inGenome research · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vera B KaiserDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California-Berkeley, USA. vera.kaiser@berkeley.edu
Qi Zhou
Doris Bachtrog
University of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

The evolution of dosage compensation in DrosophilaR01GM076007 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BACHTROG, DORIS · 2006 to 2020
$3.6M
"Gene Trafficking on an Evolving X Chromosome in Drosophila"R01GM093182 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI BACHTROG, DORIS · 2010 to 2017
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076007NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM076007NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM093182NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM093182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A lack of recombination leads to the degeneration of an evolving Y chromosome. However, it is not known whether gene loss is largely a random process and primarily driven by the order in which mutations occur or whether certain categories of genes are lost less quickly than others; the latter would imply that selection counteracts the degeneration of Y chromosomes to some extent. In this study, we investigate the relationship between putative ancestral expression levels of neo-Y-linked genes in Drosophila miranda and their rates of degeneration. We use RNA-Seq data from its close relative Drosophila pseudoobscura to show that genes that have become nonfunctional on the D. miranda neo-Y had, on average, lower ancestral transcript levels and were expressed in fewer tissues compared with genes with intact reading frames. We also show that genes with male-biased expression are retained for longer on the neo-Y compared with female-biased genes. Our results imply that gene loss on the neo-Y is not a purely random, mutation-driven process. Instead, selection is--at least to some extent--preserving the function of genes that are more costly to lose, despite the strongly reduced efficacy of selection on the neo-Y chromosome.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrosophilaEvolution, MolecularFemaleGenes, Y-LinkedMaleSequence Analysis, RNAY Chromosome

Identifiers

PMID21987387
PMCPMC3236567
OpenAlexW2109427473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.