Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21986999›Full record

ReviewDisaster medicine and public health preparedness2011

Literature review and global consensus on management of acute radiation syndrome affecting nonhematopoietic organ systems.

Nicholas Dainiak, Robert Nicolas Gent, Zhanat Carr, Rita Schneider, Judith Bader, Elena Buglova, Nelson Chao, C Norman Coleman, Arnold Ganser, Claude Gorin and 14 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Disaster medicine and public health preparedness, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. DAMPs and radiation injury.Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Radiation on Earth or in Space: What Does It Change?International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Quantitative Analysis of Effects of a SingleInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Plasma-based biomaterials for the treatment of cutaneous radiation injury.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 15 institutions in 9 countries.

Nicholas DainiakYale University School of Medicine and Yale-New Haven Health-Bridgeport Hospital, USA.
Robert Nicolas Gent
Zhanat Carr
Rita Schneider
Judith Bader
Elena Buglova
Nelson Chao
C Norman Coleman
Arnold Ganser
Claude Gorin
Martin Hauer-Jensen
L Andrew Huff
Patricia Lillis-Hearne
Kazuhiko Maekawa
Jeffrey Nemhauser
Ray Powles
Holger Schünemann
Alla Shapiro
Leif Stenke
Nelson Valverde
David Weinstock
Douglas White
Joseph Albanese
Viktor Meineke
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USDuke University · USHealth Protection Agency · MVInstitut für Radiobiologie der BundeswehrKanto Central Hospital · JPKarolinska Institutet · SEMcMaster University · CAParkside Hospital · GBSorbonne Université · FRUnited States Food and Drug Administration · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Würzburg · DEWorld Health Organization - Pakistan · PKYale University · US

Funding

Somatostatin analogues as countermeasures against intestinal radiation toxicityU19AI067798 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CHAO, NELSON J. · 2005 to 2024
$82.1M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI067798
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe World Health Organization convened a panel of experts to rank the evidence for medical countermeasures for management of acute radiation syndrome (ARS) in a hypothetical scenario involving the hospitalization of 100 to 200 victims. The goal of this panel was to achieve consensus on optimal management of ARS affecting nonhematopoietic organ systems based upon evidence in the published literature.

methodsEnglish-language articles were identified in MEDLINE and PubMed. Reference lists of retrieved articles were distributed to conferees in advance of and updated during the meeting. Published case series and case reports of ARS, publications of randomized controlled trials of relevant interventions used to treat nonirradiated individuals, reports of studies in irradiated animals, and prior recommendations of subject matter experts were selected. Studies were extracted using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation system. In cases in which data were limited or incomplete, a narrative review of the observations was made.

resultsNo randomized controlled trials of medical countermeasures have been completed for individuals with ARS. Reports of countermeasures were often incompletely described, making it necessary to rely on data generated in nonirradiated humans and in experimental animals. A strong recommendation is made for the administration of a serotonin-receptor antagonist prophylactically when the suspected exposure is >2 Gy and topical steroids, antibiotics, and antihistamines for radiation burns, ulcers, or blisters; excision and grafting of radiation ulcers or necrosis with intractable pain; provision of supportive care to individuals with neurovascular syndrome; and administration of electrolyte replacement therapy and sedatives to individuals with significant burns, hypovolemia, and/or shock. A strong recommendation is made against the use of systemic steroids in the absence of a specific indication. A weak recommendation is made for the use of fluoroquinolones, bowel decontamination, loperamide, and enteral nutrition, and for selective oropharyngeal/digestive decontamination, blood glucose maintenance, and stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients.

conclusionsHigh-quality studies of therapeutic interventions in humans exposed to nontherapeutic radiation are not available, and because of ethical concerns regarding the conduct of controlled studies in humans, such studies are unlikely to emerge in the near future.

Indexed as

Acute Radiation SyndromeConsensus Statements as TopicCritical IllnessExpert TestimonyHumansSkinSkin DiseasesUnited StatesWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID21986999
PMCPMC3638239
OpenAlexW2123075825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.