ReviewDisaster medicine and public health preparedness2011
Literature review and global consensus on management of acute radiation syndrome affecting nonhematopoietic organ systems.
Review in Disaster medicine and public health preparedness, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Gastrointestinal Subsyndrome of the Acute Radiation Syndrome in Rhesus Macaques: A Systematic Review of the Lethal Dose-response Relationship With and Without Medical Management.Health physics · 2019Pooled it
- Inhibition of eCIRP Attenuates Inflammation and Gut Injury After Radiation Combined Injury with Sepsis.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Berberine alleviates radiation-induced lung injury by promoting microbiota-derived inosinehLife · 2026Article
- Comparison of sensitivity of rhesus and cynomolgus macaque for acute radiation effects.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Chemokines as key mediators in RIPI: pathophysiology and translational potential.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Gastrointestinal Acute Radiation Syndrome: Mechanisms, Models, Markers, and Medical Countermeasures.Radiation research · 2024Article
- An Overview of Appropriate Medical Practice and Preparedness in Radiation Emergency Response.Cureus · 2024Review
- Metformin and adipose-derived stem cell combination therapy alleviates radiation-induced skin fibrosis in mice.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Article
- DAMPs and radiation injury.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- A human lung alveolus-on-a-chip model of acute radiation-induced lung injury.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Human adipose ECM alleviates radiation-induced skin fibrosis via endothelial cell-mediated M2 macrophage polarization.iScience · 2023Article
- Long-acting PGE2 and Lisinopril Mitigate H-ARS.Radiation research · 2021Article
- Radiation on Earth or in Space: What Does It Change?International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Review
- Cutaneous Radiation Injuries: Models, Assessment and Treatments.Radiation research · 2020Article
- Quantitative Analysis of Effects of a SingleInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Serum amyloid A1 as a biomarker for radiation dose estimation and lethality prediction in irradiated mouse.Annals of translational medicine · 2019Article
- C/EBPδ protects from radiation-induced intestinal injury and sepsis by suppression of inflammatory and nitrosative stress.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Use of Growth Factors and Other Cytokines for Treatment of Injuries During a Radiation Public Health Emergency.Radiation research · 2019Article
- Plasma-based biomaterials for the treatment of cutaneous radiation injury.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
24 authors at 15 institutions in 9 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe World Health Organization convened a panel of experts to rank the evidence for medical countermeasures for management of acute radiation syndrome (ARS) in a hypothetical scenario involving the hospitalization of 100 to 200 victims. The goal of this panel was to achieve consensus on optimal management of ARS affecting nonhematopoietic organ systems based upon evidence in the published literature.
methodsEnglish-language articles were identified in MEDLINE and PubMed. Reference lists of retrieved articles were distributed to conferees in advance of and updated during the meeting. Published case series and case reports of ARS, publications of randomized controlled trials of relevant interventions used to treat nonirradiated individuals, reports of studies in irradiated animals, and prior recommendations of subject matter experts were selected. Studies were extracted using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation system. In cases in which data were limited or incomplete, a narrative review of the observations was made.
resultsNo randomized controlled trials of medical countermeasures have been completed for individuals with ARS. Reports of countermeasures were often incompletely described, making it necessary to rely on data generated in nonirradiated humans and in experimental animals. A strong recommendation is made for the administration of a serotonin-receptor antagonist prophylactically when the suspected exposure is >2 Gy and topical steroids, antibiotics, and antihistamines for radiation burns, ulcers, or blisters; excision and grafting of radiation ulcers or necrosis with intractable pain; provision of supportive care to individuals with neurovascular syndrome; and administration of electrolyte replacement therapy and sedatives to individuals with significant burns, hypovolemia, and/or shock. A strong recommendation is made against the use of systemic steroids in the absence of a specific indication. A weak recommendation is made for the use of fluoroquinolones, bowel decontamination, loperamide, and enteral nutrition, and for selective oropharyngeal/digestive decontamination, blood glucose maintenance, and stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients.
conclusionsHigh-quality studies of therapeutic interventions in humans exposed to nontherapeutic radiation are not available, and because of ethical concerns regarding the conduct of controlled studies in humans, such studies are unlikely to emerge in the near future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.