Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21986636›Full record

Trial reportBone marrow transplantation2012

Prognostic factors for outcomes in allogeneic transplantation for CML in the imatinib era: a CIBMTR analysis.

H J Khoury, M Kukreja, J M Goldman, T Wang, J Halter, M Arora, V Gupta, D A Rizzieri, B George, A Keating and 10 more

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Bone marrow transplantation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Real-world Management of CML: Outcomes and Treatment Patterns.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Transplantation in CML in the TKI era: who, when, and how?Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. B-Lymphoid Blast Phase-Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Current Therapeutics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. CML Chapter.Cancer treatment and research · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 13 institutions in 6 countries.

H J KhouryDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. hkhoury@emory.edu
M Kukreja
J M Goldman
T Wang
J Halter
M Arora
V Gupta
D A Rizzieri
B George
A Keating
R P Gale
D I Marks
P L McCarthy
A Woolfrey
J Szer
S A Giralt
R T Maziarz
J Cortes
M M Horowitz
S J Lee
Medical College of Wisconsin · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CAThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USChristian Medical College · INDuke Medical Center · USEmory University · USHammersmith Hospital · GBOregon Health & Science University · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

Data Resource for Analyzing Blood &Marrow TransplantsU24CA076518 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Amy M Moskop, Bronwen Shaw · 1998 to 2026
$105.2M
PB vs. BMU01HL069294 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI HOROWITZ, MARY MARESCA · 2001 to 2010
$63.3M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA076518NCI NIH HHS U24-CA76518NHLBI NIH HHS 5U01HL069294NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL069294PHS HHS HHSH234200637015C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allogeneic hematopoietic SCT is an effective treatment in accelerated (AP) or blast phase (BP) CML. Imatinib (IM) has transient but significant activity in advanced phases of CML, which may permit early allografting for responding patients. To identify prognostic factors in allograft recipients previously treated with IM, we analyzed 449 allogeneic hematopoietic SCTs performed from 1999 to 2004 in advanced-phase CML, using the data reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. CML patients in second chronic phase (CP2, n=184), AP (n=185) and BP (n=80) received HLA-identical sibling (27%), related (3%), or matched or mismatched unrelated donor (70%), peripheral blood (47%) or BM (53%) hematopoietic SCT after myeloablative (78%) or non-myeloablative (22%) conditioning. In all, 52% in CP2, 49% in AP and 46% in BP received IM before hematopoietic SCT. Disease-free survival was 35-40% for CP2, 26-27% for AP and 8-11% for BP. Cumulative incidence of acute and chronic GVHD and TRM were not affected by the stages of CML or pre-hematopoietic SCT IM exposure. Multivariate analyses showed that conventional prognostic indicators remain the strongest determinants of transplant outcomes. In conclusion, there are no new prognostic indicators of the outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic SCT for advanced-phase CML in the IM era.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationTransplantation ConditioningAdolescentAdultAgedBenzamidesChildDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansImatinib MesylateLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveMaleMiddle AgedPiperazinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsBenzamidesImatinib MesylatePiperazinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidines

Identifiers

PMID21986636
PMCPMC3896981
OpenAlexW2048262171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.