Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21985803›Full record

ArticleBrain, behavior and evolution2011

Updated neuronal scaling rules for the brains of Glires (rodents/lagomorphs).

Suzana Herculano-Houzel, Pedro Ribeiro, Leandro Campos, Alexandre Valotta da Silva, Laila B Torres, Kenneth C Catania, Jon H Kaas

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain, behavior and evolution, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
14.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Cellular Composition of the Brain of a Northern Minke Whale.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Housing and Husbandry Alternatives for Naked Mole Rat Colonies Used in Research Settings.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2022
    Article
  15. The evolution of brain neuron numbers in amniotes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Suzana Herculano-HouzelInstituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. suzanahh@gmail.com
Pedro Ribeiro
Leandro Campos
Alexandre Valotta da Silva
Laila B Torres
Kenneth C Catania
Jon H Kaas
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRInstituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia de Neurociência Translacional · BRVanderbilt University · US

Funding

FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION OF THE VISUAL SYSTEMR01EY002686 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI KAAS, JON H · 1985 to 2023
$7.4M
FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION OF THE SOMATOSENSORY SYSTEMR01NS016446 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI KAAS, JON H · 1985 to 2018
$6.9M
NEI NIH HHS EY02686NEI NIH HHS R01 EY002686NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS016446
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain size scales as different functions of its number of neurons across mammalian orders such as rodents, primates, and insectivores. In rodents, we have previously shown that, across a sample of 6 species, from mouse to capybara, the cerebral cortex, cerebellum and the remaining brain structures increase in size faster than they gain neurons, with an accompanying decrease in neuronal density in these structures [Herculano-Houzel et al.: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:12138-12143]. Important remaining questions are whether such neuronal scaling rules within an order apply equally to all pertaining species, and whether they extend to closely related taxa. Here, we examine whether 4 other species of Rodentia, as well as the closely related rabbit (Lagomorpha), conform to the scaling rules identified previously for rodents. We report the updated neuronal scaling rules obtained for the average values of each species in a way that is directly comparable to the scaling rules that apply to primates [Gabi et al.: Brain Behav Evol 2010;76:32-44], and examine whether the scaling relationships are affected when phylogenetic relatedness in the dataset is accounted for. We have found that the brains of the spiny rat, squirrel, prairie dog and rabbit conform to the neuronal scaling rules that apply to the previous sample of rodents. The conformity to the previous rules of the new set of species, which includes the rabbit, suggests that the cellular scaling rules we have identified apply to rodents in general, and probably to Glires as a whole (rodents/lagomorphs), with one notable exception: the naked mole-rat brain is apparently an outlier, with only about half of the neurons expected from its brain size in its cerebral cortex and cerebellum.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainFemaleMaleNeuronsPhylogenyRabbitsRatsSciuridaeSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID21985803
PMCPMC3237106
OpenAlexW2036253510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.