Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21984413›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2012

Overcoming natural replication barriers: differential helicase requirements.

Ranjith P Anand, Kartik A Shah, Hengyao Niu, Patrick Sung, Sergei M Mirkin, Catherine H Freudenreich

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cross-species incompatibilities offer new insights into the functional consequences of satellite DNA evolution.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Interstitial telomeric sequences promote gross chromosomal rearrangement via multiple mechanisms.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Homologous recombination within repetitive DNA.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2021
    Review

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ranjith P AnandDepartment of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA.
Kartik A Shah
Hengyao Niu
Patrick Sung
Sergei M Mirkin
Catherine H Freudenreich
Tufts University · USYale University · US

Funding

REPLICATION OF SIMPLE DNA REPEATSR01GM060987 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MIRKIN, SERGEI · 2001 to 2017
$4.9M
FORMATION AND RESOLUTION OF RECOMBINATION INTERMEDIATESR01GM057814 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SUNG, PATRICK · 1999 to 2016
$4.2M
Stability &Fragility of Trinucleotide Repeats in YeastR01GM063066 · NIGMS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI FREUDENREICH, CATHERINE H · 2001 to 2010
$2.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM063066NIGMS NIH HHS GM57814NIGMS NIH HHS GM60987NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM060987NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM063066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA sequences that form secondary structures or bind protein complexes are known barriers to replication and potential inducers of genome instability. In order to determine which helicases facilitate DNA replication across these barriers, we analyzed fork progression through them in wild-type and mutant yeast cells, using 2-dimensional gel-electrophoretic analysis of the replication intermediates. We show that the Srs2 protein facilitates replication of hairpin-forming CGG/CCG repeats and prevents chromosome fragility at the repeat, whereas it does not affect replication of G-quadruplex forming sequences or a protein-bound repeat. Srs2 helicase activity is required for hairpin unwinding and fork progression. Also, the PCNA binding domain of Srs2 is required for its in vivo role of replication through hairpins. In contrast, the absence of Sgs1 or Pif1 helicases did not inhibit replication through structural barriers, though Pif1 did facilitate replication of a telomeric protein barrier. Interestingly, replication through a protein barrier but not a DNA structure barrier was modulated by nucleotide pool levels, illuminating a different mechanism by which cells can regulate fork progression through protein-mediated stall sites. Our analyses reveal fundamental differences in the replication of DNA structural versus protein barriers, with Srs2 helicase activity exclusively required for fork progression through hairpin structures.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationChromosome BreakageDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDNA HelicasesG-QuadruplexesNucleic Acid ConformationProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenRecQ HelicasesRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTelomereDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDNA HelicasesPIF1 protein, S cerevisiaeProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenRecQ HelicasesRrm3 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSGS1 protein, S cerevisiaeSRS2 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID21984413
PMCPMC3273818
OpenAlexW2165588418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.