ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2012
Mouse atlas registration with non-tomographic imaging modalities-a pilot study based on simulation.
Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated quantification of bioluminescence images.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Canny edge-based deformable image registration.Physics in medicine and biology · 2017Article
- Individually ventilated cages impose cold stress on laboratory mice: a source of systemic experimental variability.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2013Article
- The hidden cost of housing practices: using noninvasive imaging to quantify the metabolic demands of chronic cold stress of laboratory mice.Comparative medicine · 2013Article
- NEMA NU-4 performance evaluation of PETbox4, a high sensitivity dedicated PET preclinical tomograph.Physics in medicine and biology · 2013Article
- A method of 2D/3D registration of a statistical mouse atlas with a planar X-ray projection and an optical photo.Medical image analysis · 2013Article
- Automated analysis of small animal PET studies through deformable registration to an atlas.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2012Article
- MARS: a mouse atlas registration system based on a planar x-ray projector and an optical camera.Physics in medicine and biology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study investigates methodologies for the estimation of small animal anatomy from non-tomographic modalities, such as planar X-ray projections, optical cameras, and surface scanners. The key goal is to register a digital mouse atlas to a combination of non-tomographic modalities, in order to provide organ-level anatomical references of small animals in 3D. PROCEDURES: A 2D/3D registration method was developed to register the 3D atlas to the combination of non-tomographic imaging modalities. Eleven combinations of three non-tomographic imaging modalities were simulated, and the registration accuracy of each combination was evaluated.
resultsComparing the 11 combinations, the top-view X-ray projection combined with the side-view optical camera yielded the best overall registration accuracy of all organs. The use of a surface scanner improved the registration accuracy of skin, spleen, and kidneys.
conclusionsThe methodologies and evaluation presented in this study should provide helpful information for designing preclinical atlas-based anatomical data acquisition systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.