Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21983521›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2011

Efficacy of genetically modified Bt toxins against insects with different genetic mechanisms of resistance.

Bruce E Tabashnik, Fangneng Huang, Mukti N Ghimire, B Rogers Leonard, Blair D Siegfried, Murugesan Rangasamy, Yajun Yang, Yidong Wu, Linda J Gahan, David G Heckel and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Biophysical Analysis of Vip3Aa Toxin Mutants Before and After Activation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Cross-Regional Pollination Behavior ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Molecular Mechanism of Male Sterility Induced byMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Genetic Modification Approaches for ParasporinsMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  15. Can (We Make)Toxins · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Bruce E TabashnikDepartment of Entomology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA. brucet@cals.arizona.edu
Fangneng Huang
Mukti N Ghimire
B Rogers Leonard
Blair D Siegfried
Murugesan Rangasamy
Yajun Yang
Yidong Wu
Linda J Gahan
David G Heckel
Alejandra Bravo
Mario Soberón
Louisiana State University Agricultural Center · USNanjing Agricultural University · CNUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · USClemson University · USMax Planck Society · DEUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transgenic crops that produce Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxins are grown widely for pest control, but insect adaptation can reduce their efficacy. The genetically modified Bt toxins Cry1AbMod and Cry1AcMod were designed to counter insect resistance to native Bt toxins Cry1Ab and Cry1Ac. Previous results suggested that the modified toxins would be effective only if resistance was linked with mutations in genes encoding toxin-binding cadherin proteins. Here we report evidence from five major crop pests refuting this hypothesis. Relative to native toxins, the potency of modified toxins was >350-fold higher against resistant strains of Plutella xylostella and Ostrinia nubilalis in which resistance was not linked with cadherin mutations. Conversely, the modified toxins provided little or no advantage against some resistant strains of three other pests with altered cadherin. Independent of the presence of cadherin mutations, the relative potency of the modified toxins was generally higher against the most resistant strains.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacillus thuringiensisBacillus thuringiensis ToxinsBacterial ProteinsCadherinsEndotoxinsHemolysin ProteinsInsectaInsecticide ResistanceMothsMutationPest Control, BiologicalPlants, Genetically ModifiedBacillus thuringiensis ToxinsBacterial ProteinsCadherinsEndotoxinsHemolysin Proteinsinsecticidal crystal protein, Bacillus Thuringiensis

Identifiers

PMID21983521
OpenAlexW2088463274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.