Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21982529›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2011

Primary prophylaxis of cryptococcal disease with fluconazole in HIV-positive Ugandan adults: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

Rosalind Parkes-Ratanshi, Katie Wakeham, Jonathan Levin, Deodata Namusoke, James Whitworth, Alex Coutinho, Nathan Kenya Mugisha, Heiner Grosskurth, Anatoli Kamali, David G Lalloo and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Reducing HIV-Associated Post-Hospital Mortality Through Home-Based Care in South Africa: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Lack of Association between Fluconazole Susceptibility andJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Minimizing fungal disease deaths will allow the UNAIDS target of reducing annual AIDS deaths below 500 000 by 2020 to be realized.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Rosalind Parkes-RatanshiMedical Research Council (MRC)/Uganda Virus Research Institute (UVRI) Uganda Research Unit on AIDS, UVRI, Entebbe, Uganda. r.parkes@imperial.ac.uk
Katie Wakeham
Jonathan Levin
Deodata Namusoke
James Whitworth
Alex Coutinho
Nathan Kenya Mugisha
Heiner Grosskurth
Anatoli Kamali
David G Lalloo
Cryptococcal Trial Team
Uganda Virus Research Institute · UGLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBInfectious Diseases Institute · UGLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMinistry of Health · UGThe AIDS Support Organization · UGWellcome Trust · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0100035Medical Research Council G0601028Medical Research Council MC_U950080930
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCryptococcal disease remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected individuals in sub-Saharan Africa, despite the introduction of antiretroviral therapy. We studied fluconazole as primary prophylaxis against cryptococcal disease in patients awaiting or starting antiretroviral therapy in Uganda.

methodsIn this prospective, double-blind randomised controlled trial, we enrolled HIV-positive adults with CD4 counts less than 200 cells per μL, cryptococcal antigen (CrAg)-negative, naive for antiretroviral therapy, and coming from five local AIDS organisations in Masaka district, Uganda. Enrolment took place between Sept 14, 2004, and Feb 1, 2008. Participants were randomly allocated to placebo or 200 mg fluconazole three times per week (1:1) in blocks of 40. Randomisation was done with ralloc procedure in Stata. Participants were reviewed after 4 weeks and referred for antiretroviral therapy, then seen every 8 weeks. Participants discontinued trial treatment when CD4 counts reached 200 cells per μL (median 197 days). Primary endpoints were invasive cryptococcal disease and all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints were time to first episode and incidence of oesophageal candidosis, time to first episode and incidence of oropharyngeal or vaginal candidosis, and time to first hospital admission or death. The primary safety endpoint was cessation of trial drug because of transaminase concentrations higher than five times the upper limit of normal (ULN), or other major adverse events. Analyses were done by intention to treat and included all participants enrolled in the trial. Participants and researchers were masked to group assignment. This trial is registered with controlled-trials.com, number ISRCTN 76481529.

resultsOf 1519 individuals enrolled, 760 participants received fluconazole and 759 received placebo. 19 developed cryptococcal disease, one in the fluconazole group and 18 in the placebo group (p=0·0001); adjusted HR (aHR) 18·7 (95% CI 2·5-140·7). One case of cryptococcal disease could be prevented by treating 44·6 patients with baseline CD4 counts lower than 200 cells per μL. Fluconazole was effective against cryptococcal disease both before (aHR=11·0 [1·4-85·3]) and after start of antiretroviral therapy (no cases in fluconazole vs seven cases on placebo). Seven participants died from cryptococcal disease, none in the fluconazole group. All-cause mortality (n=189) did not differ between the two groups (p=0·46). Fluconazole reduced the time to first episode of oesophageal, and oropharyngeal and vaginal candidosis, as well as the incidence of all candidosis (p<0·0001), but had no effect on hospital admission or death. The frequency of elevated transaminases (>5×ULN) was similar between groups (aHR=0·94 [0·65-1·35]).

conclusionsFluconazole was safe and effective as primary prophylaxis against cryptococcal disease, both before and during early antiretroviral treatment. Cryptococcal infection was less common than anticipated because of the rapid commencement of antiretroviral therapy and exclusion of those with positive CrAg. In patients with negative CrAg on screening, fluconazole prophylaxis can prevent cryptococcal disease while waiting for and in the early weeks of antiretroviral therapy, particularly in those with CD4 counts of less than 100 cells per μL.

fundingMedical Research Council, UK, and Rockefeller Foundation.

Indexed as

Antibiotic ProphylaxisAdultAIDS-Related Opportunistic InfectionsAntifungal AgentsCD4 Lymphocyte CountCryptococcosisFemaleFluconazoleHIV-1HIV SeropositivityHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeUgandaAntifungal AgentsFluconazole

Identifiers

PMID21982529
PMCPMC4856956
OpenAlexW2104995661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.