ArticleBMC research notes2011
Strengthening organizational performance through accreditation research-a framework for twelve interrelated studies: the ACCREDIT project study protocol.
Article in BMC research notes, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accreditation in general practice in Denmark: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial.Trials · 2017Trial
- Effectiveness of improvement plans in primary care practice accreditation: a clustered randomized trial.PloS one · 2014Trial
- Quality management systems in Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services: a review of the literature.BMJ open quality · 2021Review
- A Parsonian Approach to Patient Safety: Transformational Leadership and Social Capital as Preconditions for Clinical Risk Management-the GI Factor.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- The Development of an Accreditation Framework for Continuing Education Activities for Pharmacists.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Developing a Model for Accreditation of Iranian Teaching Hospitals: A Qualitative Study.Ethiopian journal of health sciences · 2019Article
- An Analysis of Hospital Accreditation Policy in Iran.Iranian journal of public health · 2017Article
- Analysing 'big picture' policy reform mechanisms: the Australian health service safety and quality accreditation scheme.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015Article
- Counting the costs of accreditation in acute care: an activity-based costing approach.BMJ open · 2015Article
- Development and application of an indicator assessment tool for measuring health services accreditation programs.BMC research notes · 2015Article
- A mechanism for revising accreditation standards: a study of the process, resources required and evaluation outcomes.BMC health services research · 2014Article
- Rethinking capacity building for knowledge mobilisation: developing multilevel capabilities in healthcare organisations.Implementation science : IS · 2014Article
- Stakeholder perspectives on implementing accreditation programs: a qualitative study of enabling factors.BMC health services research · 2013Article
- Economic evaluation of Australian acute care accreditation (ACCREDIT-CBA (Acute)): study protocol for a mixed-method research project.BMJ open · 2013Article
- Evaluation of current Australian health service accreditation processes (ACCREDIT-CAP): protocol for a mixed-method research project.BMJ open · 2012Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundService accreditation is a structured process of recognising and promoting performance and adherence to standards. Typically, accreditation agencies either receive standards from an authorized body or develop new and upgrade existing standards through research and expert views. They then apply standards, criteria and performance indicators, testing their effects, and monitoring compliance with them. The accreditation process has been widely adopted. The international investments in accreditation are considerable. However, reliable evidence of its efficiency or effectiveness in achieving organizational improvements is sparse and the value of accreditation in cost-benefit terms has yet to be demonstrated. Although some evidence suggests that accreditation promotes the improvement and standardization of care, there have been calls to strengthen its research base.In response, the ACCREDIT (Accreditation Collaborative for the Conduct of Research, Evaluation and Designated Investigations through Teamwork) project has been established to evaluate the effectiveness of Australian accreditation in achieving its goals. ACCREDIT is a partnership of key researchers, policymakers and agencies.
findingsWe present the framework for our studies in accreditation. Four specific aims of the ACCREDIT project, which will direct our findings, are to: (i) evaluate current accreditation processes; (ii) analyse the costs and benefits of accreditation; (iii) improve future accreditation via evidence; and (iv) develop and apply new standards of consumer involvement in accreditation. These will be addressed through 12 interrelated studies designed to examine specific issues identified as a high priority. Novel techniques, a mix of qualitative and quantitative methods, and randomized designs relevant for health-care research have been developed. These methods allow us to circumvent the fragmented and incommensurate findings that can be generated in small-scale, project-based studies. The overall approach for our research is a multi-level, multi-study design. DISCUSSION: The ACCREDIT project will examine the utility, reliability, relevance and cost effectiveness of differing forms of accreditation, focused on general practice, aged care and acute care settings in Australia. Empirically, there are potential research gains to be made by understanding accreditation and extending existing knowledge; theoretically, this design will facilitate a systems view of accreditation of benefit to the partnership, international research communities, and future accreditation designers."Accreditation of health-care organisations is a multimillion dollar industry which shapes care in many countries. Recent reviews of research show little evidence that accreditation increases safety or improves quality. It's time we knew about the cost and value of accreditation and about its future direction." [Professor John Øvretveit, Karolinska Institute, Sweden, 7 October 2009].
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.