Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21980924›Full record

SynthesisGenes, brain, and behavior2012

BDNF Val66Met and cognition: all, none, or some? A meta-analysis of the genetic association.

S D Mandelman, E L Grigorenko

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Genes, brain, and behavior, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. TheBrain sciences · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

S D MandelmanHuman Development, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
E L Grigorenko
Columbia University · US

Funding

THE FLORIDA LONGITUDINAL STUDYP50HD052120 · NICHD · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CHRIS W SCHATSCHNEIDER · 2006 to 2026
$31.7M
Genetic Bases of Developmental Language DisordersR01DC007665 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GRIGORENKO, ELENA L · 2006 to 2010
$3.0M
Epidemiological Survey of Learning Disabilities in ZambiaR21TW006764 · FIC · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GRIGORENKO, ELENA L · 2003 to 2005
$331k
FIC NIH HHS R21 TW006764NICHD NIH HHS HD052120NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD052120NIDCD NIH HHS DC007665NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC007665
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Val66Met, G196A (rs6265) polymorphism in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene, BDNF, located at 11p13, has been associated with a wide range of cognitive functions. Yet, the pattern of results is complex and conflicting. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis that included 23 publications containing 31 independent samples comprised of 7095 individuals. The phenotypes that were examined in this analysis covered a wide variety of cognitive functions and included indicators of general cognitive ability, memory, executive function, visual processing skills and cognitive fluency. The meta-analysis did not establish significant genetic associations between the Val66Met polymorphism and any of the phenotypes that were included.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideAllelesBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorCognitionGenetic Association StudiesGenotypeHumansNeuropsychological TestsBrain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor

Identifiers

PMID21980924
PMCPMC3268899
OpenAlexW2054314829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.