ArticlePloS one2011
Electrospun PLLA nanofiber scaffolds and their use in combination with BMP-2 for reconstruction of bone defects.
Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 135 citations in OpenAlex.
- In Vivo Cell Migration and Growth Within Electrospun Porous Nanofibrous Scaffolds with Different Pore Sizes in a Mouse Pouch Model.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Nanostructures in Orthopedics: Advancing Diagnostics, Targeted Therapies, and Tissue Regeneration.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Extracellular derivatives for bone metabolism.Journal of advanced research · 2024Review
- Nanotechnology development in surgical applications: recent trends and developments.European journal of medical research · 2023Review
- Advances of three-dimensional (3D) culture systems for in vitro spermatogenesis.Stem cell research & therapy · 2023Review
- A mini-review on the emerging role of nanotechnology in revolutionizing orthopedic surgery: challenges and the road ahead.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Processes of Electrospun Polyvinylidene Fluoride-Based Nanofibers, Their Piezoelectric Properties, and Several Fantastic Applications.Polymers · 2022Review
- Ternary MXene-loaded PLCL/collagen nanofibrous scaffolds that promote spontaneous osteogenic differentiation.Nano convergence · 2022Article
- Experimental study on the biocompatibility and osteogenesis induction ability of PLLA/DDM scaffolds.Odontology · 2022Article
- Advances in Electrospun Hybrid Nanofibers for Biomedical Applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Current Methods in the Study of Nanomaterials for Bone Regeneration.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Preparation and Characterization of Electrospun Polylactic Acid (PLA) Fiber Loaded with Birch Bark Triterpene Extract for Wound Dressing.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2021Article
- Growth factor loading on aliphatic polyester scaffolds.RSC advances · 2021Review
- Micro Magnetic Field Produced by FePolymers · 2020Article
- Direct incorporation of mesenchymal stem cells into a Nanofiber scaffold - in vitro and in vivo analysis.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Adjuvant Drug-Assisted Bone Healing: Advances and Challenges in Drug Delivery Approaches.Pharmaceutics · 2020Review
- Fabrication and Plasma Modification of Nanofibrous Tissue Engineering Scaffolds.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Enhancement of osteogenic differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells by PRP modified nanofibrous scaffold.Cytotechnology · 2018Article
- Design of a 3D BMP-2-Delivering Tannylated PCL Scaffold and Its Anti-Oxidant, Anti-Inflammatory, and Osteogenic Effects In Vitro.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
- 3D Bone Biomimetic Scaffolds for Basic and Translational Studies with Mesenchymal Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAdequate migration and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells is essential for regeneration of large bone defects. To achieve this, modern graft materials are becoming increasingly important. Among them, electrospun nanofiber scaffolds are a promising approach, because of their high physical porosity and potential to mimic the extracellular matrix (ECM). MATERIALS AND
methodsThe objective of the present study was to examine the impact of electrospun PLLA nanofiber scaffolds on bone formation in vivo, using a critical size rat calvarial defect model. In addition we analyzed whether direct incorporation of bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) into nanofibers could enhance the osteoinductivity of the scaffolds. Two critical size calvarial defects (5 mm) were created in the parietal bones of adult male Sprague-Dawley rats. Defects were either (1) left unfilled, or treated with (2) bovine spongiosa, (3) PLLA scaffolds alone or (4) PLLA/BMP-2 scaffolds. Cranial CT-scans were taken at fixed intervals in vivo. Specimens obtained after euthanasia were processed for histology, histomorphometry and immunostaining (Osteocalcin, BMP-2 and Smad5).
resultsPLLA scaffolds were well colonized with cells after implantation, but only showed marginal ossification. PLLA/BMP-2 scaffolds showed much better bone regeneration and several ossification foci were observed throughout the defect. PLLA/BMP-2 scaffolds also stimulated significantly faster bone regeneration during the first eight weeks compared to bovine spongiosa. However, no significant differences between these two scaffolds could be observed after twelve weeks. Expression of osteogenic marker proteins in PLLA/BMP-2 scaffolds continuously increased throughout the observation period. After twelve weeks osteocalcin, BMP-2 and Smad5 were all significantly higher in the PLLA/BMP-2 group than in all other groups.
conclusionElectrospun PLLA nanofibers facilitate colonization of bone defects, while their use in combination with BMP-2 also increases bone regeneration in vivo and thus combines osteoconductivity of the scaffold with the ability to maintain an adequate osteogenic stimulus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.