ArticlePloS one2011
Biophysical characteristics reveal neural stem cell differentiation potential.
Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stretch-activated ion channel Piezo1 directs lineage choice in human neural stem cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014Trial
- Glioma chemotherapeutic resistance is tied to membrane electrophysiological properties and glycosylation.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026Article
- Electrophysiological analysis of mesenchymal stem cells post-cryopreservation highlights the need for a recovery period: implications for cell-based therapies.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
- Label-Free Sorting of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Using Insulating Dielectrophoresis.Electrophoresis · 2025Article
- Electrical Phenotyping of Aged Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Using Dielectrophoresis.Micromachines · 2025Article
- Quantifying the Electrophysiological Properties of Cells Using Dielectrophoresis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Regulation of neural stem cell differentiation and brain development by MGAT5-mediated N-glycosylation.Stem cell reports · 2023Article
- On-Chip Single-Cell Bioelectrical Analysis for Identification of Cell Electrical Phenotyping in Response to Sequential Electric Signal Modulation.Biosensors · 2022Article
- VScientific reports · 2021Article
- Microscale nonlinear electrokinetics for the analysis of cellular materials in clinical applications: a review.Mikrochimica acta · 2021Review
- Label-free enrichment of fate-biased human neural stem and progenitor cells.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2020Article
- Growth and Spatial Control of Murine Neural Stem Cells on Reflectin Films.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2020Article
- Differential Biophysical Behaviors of Closely Related Strains of Salmonella.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Ten-Second Electrophysiology: Evaluation of the 3DEP Platform for high-speed, high-accuracy cell analysis.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- High-throughput continuous dielectrophoretic separation of neural stem cells.Biomicrofluidics · 2019Article
- Identification of neural stem and progenitor cell subpopulations using DC insulator-based dielectrophoresis.The Analyst · 2019Article
- Cell Surface N-Glycans Influence Electrophysiological Properties and Fate Potential of Neural Stem Cells.Stem cell reports · 2018Article
- It's Electric: When Technology Gives a Boost to Stem Cell Science.Current stem cell reports · 2018Article
- Distinctive epigenomes characterize glioma stem cells and their response to differentiation cues.Genome biology · 2018Article
- Separation of neural stem cells by whole cell membrane capacitance using dielectrophoresis.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDistinguishing human neural stem/progenitor cell (huNSPC) populations that will predominantly generate neurons from those that produce glia is currently hampered by a lack of sufficient cell type-specific surface markers predictive of fate potential. This limits investigation of lineage-biased progenitors and their potential use as therapeutic agents. A live-cell biophysical and label-free measure of fate potential would solve this problem by obviating the need for specific cell surface markers. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsWe used dielectrophoresis (DEP) to analyze the biophysical, specifically electrophysiological, properties of cortical human and mouse NSPCs that vary in differentiation potential. Our data demonstrate that the electrophysiological property membrane capacitance inversely correlates with the neurogenic potential of NSPCs. Furthermore, as huNSPCs are continually passaged they decrease neuron generation and increase membrane capacitance, confirming that this parameter dynamically predicts and negatively correlates with neurogenic potential. In contrast, differences in membrane conductance between NSPCs do not consistently correlate with the ability of the cells to generate neurons. DEP crossover frequency, which is a quantitative measure of cell behavior in DEP, directly correlates with neuron generation of NSPCs, indicating a potential mechanism to separate stem cells biased to particular differentiated cell fates. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We show here that whole cell membrane capacitance, but not membrane conductance, reflects and predicts the neurogenic potential of human and mouse NSPCs. Stem cell biophysical characteristics therefore provide a completely novel and quantitative measure of stem cell fate potential and a label-free means to identify neuron- or glial-biased progenitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.