ArticlePLoS genetics2011
Genomic analysis of QTLs and genes altering natural variation in stochastic noise.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
78 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Does genetic variation in controlled experiments predict phenology of wild plants?Journal of evolutionary biology · 2026Article
- Environmental perturbation increases gene expression variability and unmasks genetic regulation for transcriptional robustness.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Establishment and maintenance of NRT2.1 inter-individual variability in plants.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- Does genetic variation in controlled experiments predict phenology of wild plants?bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Trans-regulatory loci shape natural variation of gene expression plasticity in Arabidopsis.Genetics · 2025Article
- Simple sequence repeats and their expansions: role in plant development, environmental response and adaptation.The New phytologist · 2025Review
- Article
- Embracing plant plasticity or robustness as a means of ensuring food security.Nature communications · 2025Review
- Large Differences in Herbivore Performance Emerge From Simple Herbivore Behaviours and Fine-Scale Spatial Heterogeneity in Phytochemistry.Ecology letters · 2025Article
- The variegatedComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Bet-hedging and variability in plant development: seed germination and beyond.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Review
- Detecting genetic effects on phenotype variability to capture gene-by-environment interactions: a systematic method comparison.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Review
- Traits linked to natural variation of sulfur content in Arabidopsis thaliana.Journal of experimental botany · 2024Article
- LTP2 hypomorphs show genotype-by-environment interaction in early seedling traits in Arabidopsis thaliana.The New phytologist · 2024Article
- Article
- Plant biochemical genetics in the multiomics era.Journal of experimental botany · 2023Review
- PANTOTHENATE KINASE4, LOSS OF GDU2, and TRANSPOSON PROTEIN1 affect the canalization of tomato fruit metabolism.Plant physiology · 2023Article
- Acute stress reduces population-level metabolic and proteomic variation.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the phenotypic and genomic background of variability based on litter size of Large White pigs.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2022Article
18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative genetic analysis has long been used to study how natural variation of genotype can influence an organism's phenotype. While most studies have focused on genetic determinants of phenotypic average, it is rapidly becoming understood that stochastic noise is genetically determined. However, it is not known how many traits display genetic control of stochastic noise nor how broadly these stochastic loci are distributed within the genome. Understanding these questions is critical to our understanding of quantitative traits and how they relate to the underlying causal loci, especially since stochastic noise may be directly influenced by underlying changes in the wiring of regulatory networks. We identified QTLs controlling natural variation in stochastic noise of glucosinolates, plant defense metabolites, as well as QTLs for stochastic noise of related transcripts. These loci included stochastic noise QTLs unique for either transcript or metabolite variation. Validation of these loci showed that genetic polymorphism within the regulatory network alters stochastic noise independent of effects on corresponding average levels. We examined this phenomenon more globally, using transcriptomic datasets, and found that the Arabidopsis transcriptome exhibits significant, heritable differences in stochastic noise. Further analysis allowed us to identify QTLs that control genomic stochastic noise. Some genomic QTL were in common with those altering average transcript abundance, while others were unique to stochastic noise. Using a single isogenic population, we confirmed that natural variation at ELF3 alters stochastic noise in the circadian clock and metabolism. Since polymorphisms controlling stochastic noise in genomic phenotypes exist within wild germplasm for naturally selected phenotypes, this suggests that analysis of Arabidopsis evolution should account for genetic control of stochastic variance and average phenotypes. It remains to be determined if natural genetic variation controlling stochasticity is equally distributed across the genomes of other multi-cellular eukaryotes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.