Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21980134›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2012

Cytoplasmic estrogen receptor in breast cancer.

Allison W Welsh, Donald R Lannin, Gregory S Young, Mark E Sherman, Jonine D Figueroa, N Lynn Henry, Lisa Ryden, Chungyeul Kim, Richard R Love, Rachel Schiff and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Allison W WelshDepartment of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA.
Donald R Lannin
Gregory S Young
Mark E Sherman
Jonine D Figueroa
N Lynn Henry
Lisa Ryden
Chungyeul Kim
Richard R Love
Rachel Schiff
David L Rimm
The Ohio State University · USInternational Breast Cancer Research Foundation · USNational Cancer Institute · USYale University · USLund University · SEUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Tasleem J Padamsee · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
Hormone-Related CancersZIACP010126 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI GIERACH, GRETCHEN · 2009 to 2025
$103.5M
Prediction of Breast Cancer Response to Hormonal ThearpyR33CA106709 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI RIMM, DAVID L · 2004 to 2007
$786k
Intramural NIH HHSNCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NCI NIH HHS R33 CA 106709NCI NIH HHS R33 CA106709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn addition to genomic signaling, it is accepted that estrogen receptor-α (ERα) has nonnuclear signaling functions, which correlate with tamoxifen resistance in preclinical models. However, evidence for cytoplasmic ER localization in human breast tumors is less established. We sought to determine the presence and implications of nonnuclear ER in clinical specimens. EXPERIMENTAL

designA panel of ERα-specific antibodies (SP1, MC20, F10, 60c, and 1D5) was validated by Western blot and quantitative immunofluorescent (QIF) analysis of cell lines and patient controls. Then eight retrospective cohorts collected on tissue microarrays were assessed for cytoplasmic ER. Four cohorts were from Yale (YTMA 49, 107, 130, and 128) and four others (NCI YTMA 99, South Swedish Breast Cancer Group SBII, NSABP B14, and a Vietnamese Cohort) from other sites around the world.

resultsFour of the antibodies specifically recognized ER by Western and QIF analysis, showed linear increases in amounts of ER in cell line series with progressively increasing ER, and the antibodies were reproducible on YTMA 49 with Pearson correlations (r(2) values) ranging from 0.87 to 0.94. One antibody with striking cytoplasmic staining (MC20) failed validation. We found evidence for specific cytoplasmic staining with the other four antibodies across eight cohorts. The average incidence was 1.5%, ranging from 0 to 3.2%.

conclusionsOur data show ERα is present in the cytoplasm in a number of cases using multiple antibodies while reinforcing the importance of antibody validation. In nearly 3,200 cases, cytoplasmic ER is present at very low incidence, suggesting its measurement is unlikely to be of routine clinical value.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalBlotting, WesternBreast NeoplasmsCytoplasmEstrogen Receptor alphaFemaleFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesMulticenter Studies as TopicRetrospective StudiesTissue Array AnalysisTumor Cells, CulturedAntibodies, MonoclonalESR1 protein, humanEstrogen Receptor alpha

Identifiers

PMID21980134
PMCPMC3263348
OpenAlexW2144810644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.