Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21979862›Full record

ReviewEye (London, England)2012

Emerging techniques to treat corneal neovascularisation.

J Menzel-Severing

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Eye (London, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Corneal angiogenic privilege and its failure.Experimental eye research · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Nanotechnology in corneal neovascularization therapy--a review.Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics · 2013
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

J Menzel-SeveringInstitute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK. severing@gmail.com

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neovascularisation is a major cause of visual loss in a number of ophthalmic diseases. This review aims to outline the basic regulators of vessel growth in corneal neovascularisation. An understanding of the underlying principles of physiological and pathophysiological vascular development helps to appreciate current approaches to prevent or treat corneal neovascularisation. Options for future interventions will be discussed in the light of recent evidence provided by animal models of corneal neovascularisation.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsAnimalsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabCorneal NeovascularizationDisease Models, AnimalGenetic TherapyHumansMiceVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID21979862
PMCPMC3259583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.