Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21979836›Full record

ReviewHeart failure reviews2012

Angiogenic therapy for cardiac repair based on protein delivery systems.

F R Formiga, E Tamayo, T Simón-Yarza, B Pelacho, F Prósper, M J Blanco-Prieto

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Heart failure reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The Roles of Noncardiomyocytes in Cardiac Remodeling.International journal of biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. mRNA-Based Protein Replacement Therapy for the Heart.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Cardiovascular Bio-Engineering: Current State of the Art.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Sequential delivery of angiogenic growth factors improves revascularization and heart function after myocardial infarction.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2015
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

F R FormigaDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology, School of Pharmacy, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
E Tamayo
T Simón-Yarza
B Pelacho
F Prósper
M J Blanco-Prieto

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases remain the first cause of morbidity and mortality in the developed countries and are a major problem not only in the western nations but also in developing countries. Current standard approaches for treating patients with ischemic heart disease include angioplasty or bypass surgery. However, a large number of patients cannot be treated using these procedures. Novel curative approaches under investigation include gene, cell, and protein therapy. This review focuses on potential growth factors for cardiac repair. The role of these growth factors in the angiogenic process and the therapeutic implications are reviewed. Issues including aspects of growth factor delivery are presented in relation to protein stability, dosage, routes, and safety matters. Finally, different approaches for controlled growth factor delivery are discussed as novel protein delivery platforms for cardiac regeneration.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis Inducing AgentsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMyocardial IschemiaProteinsAngiogenesis Inducing AgentsIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsProteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.