Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21978939›Full record

ArticleHealth policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2012

Stitching the gaps in the Canadian public drug coverage patchwork?: a review of provincial pharmacare policy changes from 2000 to 2010.

Jamie R Daw, Steven G Morgan

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02579655 (Assessing Outcomes of Enhanced Chronic Disease Care Through Patient Education and a Value-based Formulary Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02579655 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Assessing Outcomes of Enhanced Chronic Disease Care Through Patient Education and a Value-based Formulary Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CalgaryRan2015 to 2021Enrolled4,764ConditionsCoronary Disease, Stroke, Chronic Kidney Disease, Heart FailureArmsCopayment Elimination, Personalized Education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pharmaceutical policies: effects of regulating drug insurance schemes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Predictors of cost-related medication nonadherence in Canada: a repeated cross-sectional analysis of the Canadian Community Health Survey.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Assessing progressivity and catastrophic effect of out-of-pocket payments for healthcare in Canada: 2010-2015.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. The impact of pharmaceutical rebates on patients' drug expenditures.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2019
    Article
  16. Drug coverage in Canada: gaps and opportunities.Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jamie R DawCentre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. jdaw@chspr.ubc.ca
Steven G Morgan

Funding

CIHR 92245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe recent changes and identify emergent trends in public drug benefit policies in Canada from 2000 to 2010.

methodsFor each province, we tracked pharmacare design (namely eligibility, premiums, and patient cost-sharing) over time for three beneficiary groups: social assistance recipients, seniors, and the general non-senior population. We assess which plan designs are emerging as a national standard, where the gaps in public coverage remain, and implications for progress towards national pharmacare.

resultsExpansion of public drug coverage has been limited. For social assistance recipients, first-dollar coverage is the standard. Seniors coverage remains varied, though means testing of eligibility or cost-sharing is common. Seniors benefits were significantly expanded in only one province. As of 2010, six provinces have embraced age irrelevant catastrophic income-based coverage, in some, resulting in the elimination of seniors drug benefits.

conclusionsUniversal income-based catastrophic coverage appears to be emerging as an implicit national standard for provincial pharmacare. However, due to the variation and high level of patient cost-sharing required under these programs, convergence on this model does not equate to substantial progress towards expanding coverage or reducing interprovincial disparities. Leverage of federal spending power to promote standards for public drug coverage is necessary to uniformly protect Canadians against high drug costs.

Indexed as

CanadaCost SharingDrug CostsEligibility DeterminationHealth PolicyHealth Services ResearchHumansInsurance CoverageInsurance, Pharmaceutical ServicesPrescription DrugsRegional Medical ProgramsSocial WelfarePrescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID21978939
PMCPMC3424261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.