Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21977975›Full record

ReviewCritical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology2011

Antimutator variants of DNA polymerases.

Alan J Herr, Lindsey N Williams, Bradley D Preston

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. DNA polymerase delta in DNA replication and genome maintenance.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2012
    Review
  16. Viral quasispecies evolution.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2012
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alan J HerrDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Lindsey N Williams
Bradley D Preston
University of Washington · US

Funding

SPECIFICITY OF OXYGEN DNA DAMAGE AND MUTAGENESISP01AG001751 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RABINOVITCH, PETER S · 1985 to 2021
$29.6M
University of Washington Nathan Shock Center of Excellence in the Basic Biology of AgingP30AG013280 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI David J. Marcinek, Jessica E Young · 1995 to 2026
$27.1M
TRAINING IN MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGYT32GM007270 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RAIBLE, DAVID W · 1985 to 2020
$21.0M
Seattle Cancer and Aging ProgramP20CA103728 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI RABINOVITCH, PETER S · 2003 to 2007
$3.4M
DNA Replication Fidelity and CancerR01CA098243 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PRESTON, BRADLEY D · 2004 to 2007
$976k
Pol Epsilon Proofreading and Genetic Stability in MiceR01CA111582 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PRESTON, BRADLEY D · 2006 to 2009
$974k
MUTATOR ALLELES OF DNA POLYMERASE DELTAR01ES009927 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PRESTON, BRADLEY D · 2000 to 2003
$903k
NCI NIH HHS P20 CA103728NCI NIH HHS R01 CA098243NCI NIH HHS R01 CA111582NIA NIH HHS P01 AG001751NIA NIH HHS P01 AG01751NIA NIH HHS P30 AG013280NIA NIH HHS P30 AG13280NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES009927NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES09927NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007270NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM07270Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolution balances DNA replication speed and accuracy to optimize replicative fitness and genetic stability. There is no selective pressure to improve DNA replication fidelity beyond the background mutation rate from other sources, such as DNA damage. However, DNA polymerases remain amenable to amino acid substitutions that lower intrinsic error rates. Here, we review these 'antimutagenic' changes in DNA polymerases and discuss what they reveal about mechanisms of replication fidelity. Pioneering studies with bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase (T4 Pol) established the paradigm that antimutator amino acid substitutions reduce replication errors by increasing proofreading efficiency at the expense of polymerase processivity. The discoveries of antimutator substitutions in proofreading-deficient 'mutator' derivatives of bacterial Pols I and III and yeast Pol δ suggest there must be additional antimutagenic mechanisms. Remarkably, many of the affected amino acid positions from Pol I, Pol III, and Pol δ are similar to the original T4 Pol substitutions. The locations of antimutator substitutions within DNA polymerase structures suggest that they may increase nucleotide selectivity and/or promote dissociation of primer termini from polymerases poised for misincorporation, leading to expulsion of incorrect nucleotides. If misincorporation occurs, enhanced primer dissociation from polymerase domains may improve proofreading in cis by an intrinsic exonuclease or in trans by alternate cellular proofreading activities. Together, these studies reveal that natural selection can readily restore replication error rates to sustainable levels following an adaptive mutator phenotype.

Indexed as

MutationAnimalsDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA Mismatch RepairDNA ReplicationGenetic VariationHumansModels, MolecularProtein ConformationDNA-Directed DNA Polymerase

Identifiers

PMID21977975
PMCPMC3725746
OpenAlexW2064036981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.