ArticleBeilstein journal of nanotechnology2010
Magnetic nanoparticles for biomedical NMR-based diagnostics.
Article in Beilstein journal of nanotechnology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Acoustic Parameters in Droplet Vaporization of Perfluoropentane Nanodroplets forACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Article
- Exosome isolation and characterization for advanced diagnostic and therapeutic applications.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Current Trends and Advances in Nanoplatforms-Based Imaging for Cancer Diagnosis.Indian journal of microbiology · 2025Article
- Progresses and Prospects on Glucosinolate Detection in Cruciferous Plants.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Facile synthesis of FeScientific reports · 2024Article
- Efficient Green Synthesis of (FeMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Hydrogels for Exosome Delivery in Biomedical Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- MPACell reports methods · 2022Article
- Molecular Mirror Technology Facilitates High-Throughput, Accurate SARS-CoV-2 Testing.Microbiology spectrum · 2021Article
- A simple, high-throughput method of protein and label removal from extracellular vesicle samples.Nanoscale · 2021Article
- The Effects of a Varied Gold Shell Thickness on Iron Oxide Nanoparticle Cores in Magnetic Manipulation, TNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- An ultrasensitive hybridization chain reaction-amplified CRISPR-Cas12a aptasensor for extracellular vesicle surface protein quantification.Theranostics · 2020Article
- Magnetic-field-assisted synthesis of anisotropic iron oxide particles: Effect of pH.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2020Article
- Biosensors for Detection of Human Placental Pathologies: A Review of Emerging Technologies and Current Trends.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2019Review
- Design and synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles for biomedical diagnostics.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2018Review
- New Technologies for Analysis of Extracellular Vesicles.Chemical reviews · 2018Review
- Size-selected FeBeilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2018Article
- Recent Developments in Magnetic Diagnostic Systems.Chemical reviews · 2015Review
- A "Smart" ¹²⁸Xe NMR Biosensor for pH-Dependent Cell Labeling.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2015Article
- Nanoneuromedicines for degenerative, inflammatory, and infectious nervous system diseases.Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rapid and accurate measurements of protein biomarkers, pathogens and cells in biological samples could provide useful information for early disease diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and design of personalized medicine. In general, biological samples have only negligible magnetic susceptibility. Thus, using magnetic nanoparticles for biosensing not only enhances sensitivity but also effectively reduces sample preparation needs. This review focuses on the use of magnetic nanoparticles for in vitro detection of biomolecules and cells based on magnetic resonance effects. This detection platform, termed diagnostic magnetic resonance (DMR), exploits magnetic nanoparticles as proximity sensors, which modulate the spin-spin relaxation time of water molecules surrounding molecularly-targeted nanoparticles. By developing more effective magnetic nanoparticle biosensors, DMR detection limits for various target moieties have been considerably improved over the last few years. Already, a library of magnetic nanoparticles has been developed, in which a wide range of targets, including DNA/mRNA, proteins, small molecules/drugs, bacteria, and tumor cells, have been quantified. More recently, the capabilities of DMR technology have been further advanced with new developments such as miniaturized nuclear magnetic resonance detectors, better magnetic nanoparticles and novel conjugational methods. These developments have enabled parallel and sensitive measurements to be made from small volume samples. Thus, the DMR technology is a highly attractive platform for portable, low-cost, and efficient biomolecular detection within a biomedical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.