Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21977355›Full record

ArticleThe primary care companion for CNS disorders2011

Impact of physician counseling and perception of teratogenic risks: a survey of 96 nonpregnant women with anxiety.

Tiffany Behringer, Bruce L Rollman, Bea Herbeck-Belnap, Patricia R Houck, Sati Mazumdar, Eleanor Bimla Schwarz

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The primary care companion for CNS disorders, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00158327 (The RELAX Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00158327 phase3completednot on this map

The RELAX Trial: Reducing Limitations From Anxiety in Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2004 to 2011Enrolled360ConditionsAnxiety Disorders, Panic DisorderArmsTelephone-based collaborative care, Usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Perceptions of medicine use among pregnant women: an interview-based study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tiffany BehringerDivision of General Internal Medicine, Center for Research on Health Care (Drs Rollman, Herbeck-Belnap, and Schwarz); Department of Psychiatry (Ms Houck); and Departments of Epidemiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology (Dr Schwarz), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (Ms Behringer); and Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health (Dr Mazumdar), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Bruce L Rollman
Bea Herbeck-Belnap
Patricia R Houck
Sati Mazumdar
Eleanor Bimla Schwarz
University of Pittsburgh · USHanoi Open University · VN

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000005 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$50.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the impact of physician counseling on perceived risks, benefits, and likelihood of use of anxiolytic pharmacotherapy during pregnancy among women with a history of anxiety.

methodWe surveyed 96 nonpregnant women, aged 21-45 years, with panic disorder and/or generalized anxiety disorder (DSM-IV criteria) recruited by their family physicians to participate in an anxiety treatment trial from 7 primary care practices in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Trained research assistants telephoned study participants to assess sociodemographics, psychiatric history, comorbidities, and anxiety severity. Respondents were asked to assess risks, benefits, and likelihood of taking a prescribed anxiolytic during pregnancy using 3 Likert scales at baseline. Respondents were then asked to indicate whether their perceptions would change with (1) a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warning reporting a 5% chance of birth defects with use and (2) physician counseling that the medication was safe during pregnancy despite the warning. Data were collected from January 1, 2005, through December 30, 2007.

resultsIn this study, 46% (44/96) of respondents had generalized anxiety disorder, 14% (14/96) had panic disorder, and 40% (38/96) had both generalized anxiety disorder and panic disorder. The mean baseline Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale score was 25.6 (SD = 8.4). Respondents were less likely to perceive risk if counseled by their primary care physicians that medication use was safe despite FDA warning. They also saw more benefit in use and reported being more likely to take anxiolytic medications during pregnancy if counseled that doing so was safe. Age, ethnicity, and severity of anxiety did not modify the effect of physician counseling. However, college educated women were less likely to be reassured by primary care physician counseling (P = .05) that anxiolytic use during pregnancy was safe.

conclusionsWomen with anxiety disorders are often hesitant to use anxiolytic medications during pregnancy. Physician counseling may change some women's perceptions of risk and decisions regarding use during pregnancy.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00158327.

Identifiers

PMID21977355
PMCPMC3184592
OpenAlexW2051240821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.