Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21977184›Full record

ArticleMaedica2011

Epidemiological survey 6 years apart: increased prevalence of asthma and other allergic diseases in schoolchildren aged 13-14 years in cluj-napoca, romania (based on isaac questionnaire).

Paraschiva Chereches-Panta, Sorin C, Diana Dumitrescu, Mirela Marshall, Ileana Mirestean, Mariana Muresan, Daniela Iacob, Mihaela Farcau, Gabriela E Ichim, Mircea V Nanulescu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maedica, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paraschiva Chereches-PantaUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy "Iuliu Hatieganu", 3 Paediatric Department, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Sorin C
Diana Dumitrescu
Mirela Marshall
Ileana Mirestean
Mariana Muresan
Daniela Iacob
Mihaela Farcau
Gabriela E Ichim
Mircea V Nanulescu
Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of asthma and allergy has increased during recent decades.

objectiveWe investigate the prevalence of asthma and other allergic diseases in children aged 13-14 years and we evaluate the trend of prevalence after an interval of 6 years. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe used a core questionnaire designed by the International Study of Asthma and Allergy in Children. In 1991, the questionnaire was administered to 2,866 children from a Romanian city and during 2001 to 1,657 children from the same area.

resultsThe prevalence of asthma increased from 3.3% in 1995 to 5.5% in 2001 (p<0.001). In 1995, 4.3% of children reported asthma-related symptoms, significantly fewer than the percentage 6 years later (13.6%; p<0.00001). Similar results were obtained with regard to allergic rhinitis (13.6% versus 20%; p<0.00001) and eczema (11.5% versus 16.2%; p=0.00015). As far as gender differences are concerned, in the first stage of study all three allergic disorders were found to occur more frequently in females. In the study undertaken in 2001, females proved to have a higher prevalence of asthma (p=0.226), but a lower prevalence for allergic rhinitis (p=0.121) and eczema (p=0.064).

conclusionsThe prevalence of asthma and allergy increased significantly during the past 6 years.

Indexed as

asthma prevalencechildrenISAAC studyRomania

Identifiers

PMID21977184
PMCPMC3150021
OpenAlexW228001916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.