ArticleMaedica2010
Urinary Tract Infections Associated with Candida albicans.
Article in Maedica, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epidemiology of fungal urinary tract infections: A retrospective case series.New microbes and new infections · 2025Article
- Trends in Antimicrobial Resistance of Uropathogens Isolated from Urinary Tract Infections in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Dhaka, Bangladesh.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Five-year cross-sectional study to determine the burden ofBMJ open · 2023Article
- Amino Acid Sensing and Assimilation by the Fungal PathogenPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Antimicrobial activity of medicinal plants used for urinary tract infections in pastoralist community in Ethiopia.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2021Article
- Urinary tract infections (UTIs) or genital tract infections (GTIs)? It's the diagnostics that count.GMS hygiene and infection control · 2019Review
- Candiduria; a review article with specific data from Iran.Turkish journal of urology · 2018Review
- Uropathogenic Escherichia coli virulence genes: invaluable approaches for designing DNA microarray probes.Central European journal of urology · 2015Review
- Urinary tract infections and Candida albicans.Central European journal of urology · 2015Review
- Surveillance of multidrug resistant uropathogenic bacteria in hospitalized patients in Indian.Asian Pacific journal of tropical biomedicine · 2013Article
- Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: the role of an antifungal regimen.Central European journal of urology · 2013Article
- Candiduria in hospitalized patients in teaching hospitals of Ahvaz.Iranian journal of microbiology · 2012Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesCandida albicans is an opportunistic fungal pathogen which causes urinary tract candidiasis in humans. In this research, we tried to find out the frequency of the Urinary Tract Infections associated with Candida albicans in patients who referred to Central Laboratory of Dr. Shariati Hospital, during 2 years (April 2006- April 2008). MATERIALS AND
methodsAccording to the archived recorded data, the questionnaires were filled out. At the end of this retrospective research, the statistical tests of Chi Square were operated through SPSS software version 15. OUTCOMES: The results showed that, the Urinary Tract Infections associated with Candida albicans included 6.8% of patients. The remaining 93.2% of Urinary Tract Infections had related to bacterial pathogens.
conclusionsThe statistical analyses confirmed the significant association between Urinary Tract Infections caused by Candida albicans and female gender (P<0.05).
Indexed as
Identifiers
21977170PMC3152833W1593218769What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.