ArticleMaedica2010
The interrupter technique: feasibility in children in acute asthma.
Article in Maedica, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application of Interrupter Resistance and Spirometry Techniques in Pediatric Pulmonary Medicine: Feasibility and Concordance in Healthy Children Under 8 Years.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAsthma exacerbation's severity is difficult to evaluate, as it is mainly assessed by clinical parameters. Evaluation of lung function during the acute asthma might provide an objective assessment on the severity of respiratory function impairment.
objectiveTo determine feasibility of interrupter technique in evaluating respiratory resistance (Rocc) on children with acute asthmaMethods: The study included 30 children aged 3 to 14 years, diagnosed with asthma, during an exacerbation; severity of acute asthma has been assessed according to the GINA classification 2007, evaluating individual parameters like intercostals retractions, wheezing, air entry intensity, as well as their association in a clinical score. For every patient spirometry, peakflowmetry and the interrupter technique was applied for assessing respiratory function. The feasibility rate for each method was calculated and compared with the clinical parameters.
resultsOut of the 30 children examined, the feasibility rate during the attack was 90% for the interrupter technique, 47% for peakflowmetry and only 27% for spirometry. Fifty-three percent of the exacerbations were classified as mild, 30% of moderate intensity and the remaining 37% being classified as severe exacerbations. The baseline Rocc has been correlated with clinical parameters and the clinical severity score. Best correlations were recorded between baseline Rocc and respiratory rate (r=0.73, p<0.0001), Rocc and heart rate (r=0.5, p=0.0076) and Rocc and the clinical score (r= 0.78, p<0.0001).
conclusionThe study shows good feasibility of interrupter technique during asthma exacerbations, as well as strong correlation with clinical parameters assessing severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21977111PMC3150074What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.