Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21976955›Full record

ArticleMolecular vision2011

The chicken cornea as a model of wound healing and neuronal re-innervation.

Eric R Ritchey, Kimberly Code, Christopher P Zelinka, Melissa A Scott, Andy J Fischer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular vision, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Ex Vivo Corneal Organ Culture Model for Wound Healing Studies.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric R RitcheyCollege of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Kimberly Code
Christopher P Zelinka
Melissa A Scott
Andy J Fischer
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

Muller glia and neuronal regeneration in the retinaR01EY016043 · NEI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI FISCHER, ANDY J · 2006 to 2009
$1.2M
NEI NIH HHS EY016043-05NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe cornea is the major refractive component of the eye and serves as a barrier to the external environment. Understanding how the cornea responds to injury is important to developing therapies to treat vision disorders that affect the integrity and refractive properties of the cornea. Thus, investigation of the wound healing responses of the cornea to injury in a cost-effective animal model is a valuable tool for research. This study characterizes the wound healing responses in the corneas of White Leghorn chicken.

methodsLinear corneal wounds were induced in post-natal day 7 (P7) chicks and cellular proliferation, apoptosis and regulation of structural proteins were assessed using immunohistochemical techniques. We describe the time course of increased expression of different scar-related markers, including vimentin, vinculin, perlecan and smooth muscle actin.

resultsWe find evidence for acute necrotic cell death in the corneal region immediately surrounding cite of incision, whereas we failed to find evidence of delayed cell death or apoptosis. We find that the neuronal re-innervation of SV2-positive axon terminals within the corneal stroma and epithelium occurs very quickly after the initial scarring insult. We describe an accumulation of cells within the stroma immediately underlying the scar, which results, at least in part, from the local proliferation of keratocytes. Further, we provide evidence for scar-induced accumulations of CD45-positive monocytes in injured corneas.

conclusionsWe conclude that the chick cornea is an excellent model system in which to study wound healing, formation of scar tissue, and neuronal re-innervation of sensory endings.

Indexed as

ActinsAnimalsAnimals, NewbornBiomarkersBromodeoxyuridineCell ProliferationChickensCicatrixCorneaCorneal InjuriesCorneal KeratocytesFibroblastsHeparan Sulfate ProteoglycansImmunohistochemistryLeukocyte Common AntigensMicroscopyActinsBiomarkersBromodeoxyuridineHeparan Sulfate ProteoglycansLeukocyte Common AntigensperlecanVimentinVinculin

Identifiers

PMID21976955
PMCPMC3185018
OpenAlexW1546877013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.