Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21976549›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2011

Enhanced antitumor efficacy of low-dose Etoposide with oncolytic herpes simplex virus in human glioblastoma stem cell xenografts.

Tooba A Cheema, Ryuichi Kanai, Geon Woo Kim, Hiroaki Wakimoto, Brent Passer, Samuel D Rabkin, Robert L Martuza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Oncolytic HSV and cancer drug interactions: Current clinical status and future directions.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tooba A CheemaBrain Tumor Research Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Ryuichi Kanai
Geon Woo Kim
Hiroaki Wakimoto
Brent Passer
Samuel D Rabkin
Robert L Martuza
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

GENETICALLY ENGINEERED VIRUSES FOR BRAIN TUMOR THERAPYR01NS032677 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MARTUZA, ROBERT L · 1994 to 2022
$9.0M
NINDS NIH HHS NS-032677NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS032677
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGlioblastoma (GBM) inevitably recurs despite surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. A subpopulation of tumor cells, GBM stem cells (GSC), has been implicated in this recurrence. The chemotherapeutic agent etoposide is generally reserved for treating recurrent tumors; however, its effectiveness is limited due to acute and cumulative toxicities to normal tissues. We investigate a novel combinatorial approach of low-dose etoposide with an oncolytic HSV to enhance antitumor activity and limit drug toxicity. EXPERIMENTAL

designIn vitro, human GBM cell lines and GSCs were treated with etoposide alone, oncolytic herpes simplex virus (oHSV) G47Δ alone, or the combination. Cytotoxic interactions were analyzed using the Chou-Talalay method, and changes in caspase-dependent apoptosis and cell cycle were determined. In vivo, the most etoposide-resistant human GSC, BT74, was implanted intracranially and treated with either treatment alone or the combination. Analysis included effects on survival, therapy-associated adverse events, and histologic detection of apoptosis.

resultsGSCs varied in their sensitivity to etoposide by over 50-fold in vitro, whereas their sensitivity to G47Δ was similar. Combining G47Δ with low-dose etoposide was moderately synergistic in GSCs and GBM cell lines. This combination did not enhance virus replication, but significantly increased apoptosis. In vivo, the combination of a single cycle of low-dose etoposide with G47Δ significantly extended survival of mice-bearing etoposide-insensitive intracranial human GSC-derived tumors.

conclusionsThe combination of low-dose etoposide with G47Δ increases survival of mice-bearing intracranial human GSC-derived tumors without adverse side effects. These results establish this as a promising combination strategy to treat resistant and recurrent GBM.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicApoptosisBrain NeoplasmsCamptothecinCell CycleCell Line, TumorCombined Modality TherapyEtoposideGlioblastomaHumansIrinotecanMiceMice, NudeNeural Stem CellsOncolytic VirotherapyAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCamptothecinEtoposideIrinotecanTopoisomerase I Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID21976549
PMCPMC3229640
OpenAlexW1980030143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.