ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2011
Comparison of abortion and infection after experimental challenge of pregnant bison and cattle with Brucella abortus strain 2308.
Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biological characteristics, human cell interaction mechanisms, and differential clinical outcomes of infection by Brucella melitensis, Brucella abortus, Brucella suis, and Brucella canis.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Assessing the efficiency of the bovine brucellosis surveillance-control system in a disease-free context through agent-based modelling.Veterinary research · 2025Article
- Comparison of bison and elk susceptibility to experimental challenge withFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Fecal and vaginal microbiota of vaccinated and non-vaccinated pregnant elk challenged withFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Effect of co-positivity for brucellosis and tuberculosis on milk yield and fertility of Holstein cows.Tropical animal health and production · 2021Article
- Seroprevalence and risk factors of brucellosis and the brucellosis model at the individual level of dairy cattle in the West Bandung District, Indonesia.Veterinary world · 2021Article
- Article
- Brucella melitensis Rev.1 vaccination generates a higher shedding risk of the vaccine strain in Alpine ibex (Capra ibex) compared to the domestic goat (Capra hircus).Veterinary research · 2019Article
- Coincidence cloning recovery of Brucella melitensis RNA from goat tissues: advancing the in vivo analysis of pathogen gene expression in brucellosis.BMC molecular biology · 2018Article
- Collection and Processing of Lymph Nodes from Large Animals for RNA Analysis: Preparing for Lymph Node Transcriptomic Studies of Large Animal Species.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2018Article
- High Shedding Potential and Significant Individual Heterogeneity in Naturally-Infected Alpine ibex (Frontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- Article
- Article
- Human Brucellosis and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes.Current tropical medicine reports · 2016Article
- Vaccination of Elk (Cervus canadensis) with Brucella abortus Strain RB51 Overexpressing Superoxide Dismutase and Glycosyltransferase Genes Does Not Induce Adequate Protection against Experimental Brucella abortus Challenge.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2016Article
- Milk yield and reproductive performance of brucellosis-vaccinated but seropositive Holstein cows.Tropical animal health and production · 2014Article
- Efficacy of dart or booster vaccination with strain RB51 in protecting bison against experimental Brucella abortus challenge.Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A comparative study was conducted using data from naive bison (n = 45) and cattle (n = 46) from 8 and 6 studies, respectively, in which a standardized Brucella abortus strain 2308 experimental challenge was administered during midgestation. The incidence of abortion, fetal infection, uterine or mammary infection, or infection in maternal tissues after experimental challenge was greater (P < 0.05) in bison than in cattle. In animals that did abort, the time between experimental challenge and abortion was shorter (P < 0.05) for bison than for cattle. Brucella colonization of four target tissues and serologic responses on the standard tube agglutination test at the time of abortion did not differ (P > 0.05) between cattle and bison. The results of our study suggest that naive bison and cattle have similarities and differences after experimental exposure to a virulent B. abortus strain. Although our data suggest that bison may be more susceptible to infection with Brucella, some pathogenic characteristics of brucellosis were similar between bison and cattle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.