ArticleIntensive care medicine2011
Tidal volume delivery during surfactant administration in the delivery room.
Article in Intensive care medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breath-Triggered Drug Release System for Preterm Neonates.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- Article
- Unraveling the Links Between the Initiation of Ventilation and Brain Injury in Preterm Infants.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2015Review
- Noninvasive Monitoring during Interhospital Transport of Newborn Infants.Critical care research and practice · 2013Article
- Surfactant Administration During Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeReduced mortality for infants born at less than 30 weeks’ gestation after prophylactic surfactant administration has led many to advocate routine intubation and administration of surfactant in all infants at risk of respiratory distress syndrome. However, surfactant administration is associated with adverse events including bradycardia, changes in cerebral blood flow and endotracheal tube obstruction. The aim of this study was to analyse respiratory function immediately before and after surfactant administration in the delivery room.
methodsWe reviewed video recordings of the initial resuscitation in the delivery room of infants born at less than 32 weeks’ gestation between February 2007 and March 2010. Positive pressure ventilation was delivered with either a Neopuff T-piece or self-inflating bag. Respiratory parameters were recorded with a respiratory function monitor (RFM). Each RFM recording was analysed for 30 s before and 2 min after surfactant administration.
resultsOf 230 infants recorded during the study period 16 infants received surfactant in the delivery room. Their mean (standard deviation, SD) gestation and birth weight were 25 (1) weeks and 757 (249) g, respectively. Complete airway obstruction was seen in 4/16 (25%) infants. The median (interquartile range, IQR) duration of this obstruction was 16 (8–27) s. The median (IQR) expired tidal volume before surfactant delivery was 8.0 (5.2–11.2) mL/kg compared to 4.6 (4.1–7.3) mL/kg (p = 0.03) after surfactant administration.
conclusionSubstantial tidal volume changes occur before, during and after surfactant administration in the delivery room. Complete airway obstruction is common. Monitoring respiratory function during this procedure may help to assess the delivered tidal volume and airway pressures after surfactant treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21976187What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.