Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21975767›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2011

High dose versus low dose oxytocin for augmentation of delayed labour.

Rintaro Mori, Hironobu Tokumasu, Debbie Pledge, Sara Kenyon

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. High-dose versus low-dose oxytocin for augmentation of delayed labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Risk Factors for Brachial Plexus Birth Injury.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Rintaro MoriCollaboration for Research in Global Women's and Children's Health, 1-13-10 Matsunoki, Suginami-ku, Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, 166-0014.
Hironobu Tokumasu
Debbie Pledge
Sara Kenyon
Kagoshima City Hospital · JPNational Center for Women and Children’s Health, China CDC · CNUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA major cause of failure to achieve spontaneous vaginal birth is delay in labour caused by presumed inefficient uterine action. High dose may potentially increase the number of spontaneous vaginal births, but as oxytocin can cause hyperstimulation of the uterus, there is a possibility of increased adverse events.

objectivesTo compare starting dose and increment of amount of oxytocin for augmentation for women delayed in labour to determine whether augmentation by high dose of oxytocin improves labour outcomes and the effect on both maternal/neonatal outcomes and women's birth experiences. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (28 February 2011) and reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials for women in delayed in labour requiring augmentation by oxytocin comparing high starting and increment dose (defined as starting dose and increment of equal to or more than 4 mU per minute) with low dose (defined as starting dose and an increment of less than 4 mU per minute. Increase interval: between 15 and 40 minutes. The separation of low and high doses is based on an arbitrary decision. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three review authors undertook assessment of trial eligibility, risk of bias, and data extraction independently. MAIN

resultsWe included four studies involving 660 pregnant women. Three studies were randomised controlled trials and one trial was a quasi-randomised study. A higher dose of oxytocin was associated with a significant reduction in length of labour reported from one trial (mean difference (MD) -3.50 hours; 95% confidence interval (CI) -6.38 to -0.62; one trial, 40 women). There was a decrease in rate of caesarean section (risk ratio (RR) 0.53; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.75, four trials, 650 women) and an increase in the rate of spontaneous vaginal birth (RR 1.37; 95% CI 1.15 to 1.64, two trials, 350 women). There were no significant differences for neonatal mortality, hyperstimulation, chorioamnionitis, epidural analgesia; or neonatal outcomes of Apgar scores, umbilical cord pH or admission to special care baby unit. The following outcomes were not evaluated in the included studies: perinatal mortality, women's satisfaction, instrumental vaginal birth, uterine rupture, postpartum haemorrhage, abnormal cardiotocography, women's pyrexia, dystocia and neonatal neurological morbidity. AUTHORS'

conclusionsHigher dose of oxytocin starting and increment dose (4 mU per minute or more) was associated with a reduction in the length of labour and in caesarean section, and an increase in spontaneous vaginal birth. However, there is insufficient evidence. The number of studies and the quality of the available evidence is of concern. Additionally, there is insufficient evidence for other maternal and neonatal outcomes, and how women feel about the higher doses of oxytocin. Therefore, no firm recommendation can be made. Further research should evaluate the effect of high dose oxytocin for women delayed in labour and should include these outcomes.

Indexed as

Administration, OralCesarean SectionFemaleHumansLabor Stage, SecondObstetric Labor ComplicationsOxytocicsOxytocinPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTime FactorsOxytocicsOxytocin

Identifiers

PMID21975767
OpenAlexW4239010056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.