SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2011
Calcium supplementation (other than for preventing or treating hypertension) for improving pregnancy and infant outcomes.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.
- Calcium supplementation (other than for preventing or treating hypertension) for improving pregnancy and infant outcomes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Calcium supplementation during pregnancy and maternal and offspring bone health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Effect of micronutrient supplements on low-risk pregnancies in high-income countries: a systematic quantitative literature review.Public health nutrition · 2020Pooled it
- Calcium supplementation (other than for preventing or treating hypertension) for improving pregnancy and infant outcomes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Antenatal interventions to reduce preterm birth: an overview of Cochrane Systematic Reviews.BMC research notes · 2014Pooled it
- Concordance of effects of medical interventions on hospital admission and readmission rates with effects on mortality.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2013Pooled it
- Micronutrients and pregnancy; effect of supplementation on pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review.Nutrition journal · 2013Pooled it
- Reducing stillbirths: prevention and management of medical disorders and infections during pregnancy.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2009Pooled it
- Dietary iron and calcium intakes during pregnancy are associated with lower risk of prematurity, stillbirth and neonatal mortality among women in Tanzania.Public health nutrition · 2017Trial
- Maternal calcium metabolic stress and fetal growth.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2014Trial
- Randomized, placebo-controlled, calcium supplementation trial in pregnant Gambian women accustomed to a low calcium intake: effects on maternal blood pressure and infant growth.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2013Trial
- An evidence review and nutritional conceptual framework for pre-eclampsia prevention.The British journal of nutrition · 2023Review
- Nutrient supplementation among pregnant women in China: an observational study.Public health nutrition · 2022Observational
- Calcium supplementation for the prevention of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: current evidence and programmatic considerations.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2022Article
- Enhancing Nutrition and Antenatal Infection Treatment (ENAT) study: protocol of a pragmatic clinical effectiveness study to improve birth outcomes in Ethiopia.BMJ paediatrics open · 2022Article
- The Effect and Potential Mechanism of Maternal Micronutrient Intake on Offspring Glucose Metabolism: An Emerging Field.Frontiers in nutrition · 2021Review
- Safety and efficacy of supplements in pregnancy.Nutrition reviews · 2020Review
- Lipid based nutrient supplements during pregnancy may improve foetal growth in HIV infected women - A cohort study.PloS one · 2019Article
- The good, the bad, and the ugly of calcium supplementation: a review of calcium intake on human health.Clinical interventions in aging · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMaternal nutrition during pregnancy is known to have an effect on fetal growth and development. It is recommended that women increase their calcium intake during pregnancy and lactation, although the recommended dosage varies among professionals. Currently, there is no consensus on the role of routine calcium supplementation for pregnant women other than for preventing or treating hypertension.
objectivesTo determine the effect of calcium supplementation on maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes (other than for preventing or treating hypertension) as well as any possible side effects. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (17 March 2011). SELECTION CRITERIA: We considered all published, unpublished and ongoing randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women who received calcium supplementation versus placebo or no treatment. We excluded quasi- and pseudo-RCTs. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors identified studies for inclusion and extracted the data. Two review authors performed data analysis. MAIN
resultsThis review includes data from 21 studies (involving 16,602 women). There were no statistically significant differences between women who received calcium supplementation and those who did not in terms of reducing preterm births (less than 37 weeks' gestation) (risk ratio (RR) 0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73 to 1.11; 12 studies, 15615 women; random-effects model) and also in less than 34 weeks' gestation (RR 1.11; 95% CI 0.84 to 1.46; three trials, 5145 women). There was no significant difference in infant low birth weight between the two groups (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.72 to 1.16; four trials, 13449 infants; random-effects). However, compared to the control group, women in the calcium supplementation group gave birth to slightly heavier birth weight infants (mean difference (MD) 64.66 g; 95% CI 15.75 to 113.58; 19 trials, 8287 women; random-effects). AUTHORS'
conclusionsCalcium supplementation is associated with a significant protective benefit in the prevention of pre-eclampsia, and should be used for this indication according to a previous review. This review indicates that there are no additional benefits for calcium supplementation in prevention of preterm birth or low infant birth weight. While there was a statistically significant difference of 80 g identified in mean infant birth weight, there was significant heterogeneity identified, and the clinical significance of this difference is uncertain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.