Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21975752›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2011

Non-pharmacological management of infant and young child procedural pain.

Rebecca R Pillai Riddell, Nicole M Racine, Kara Turcotte, Lindsay S Uman, Rachel E Horton, Laila Din Osmun, Sara Ahola Kohut, Jessica Hillgrove Stuart, Bonnie Stevens, Alanna Gerwitz-Stern

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02133716 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Breast Milk Expressed Versus Sucrose Relief Procedural Pain of Venipuncture in Preterm.

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital General Universitario Gregorio MarañonRan2013 to 2014Enrolled54ConditionsPain, Premature Infant, Human Milk, BreastfeedingArmsexpressed breast milk, sucrose 24% oral
NCT02815904 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Early Yakson Touch and Kinesthetic Stimulation on the Development of High Risk neonates-a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAsir John SamuelRan2016 to 2017Enrolled28ConditionsPreterm Infants, Infant, Low Birth WeightArmsYakson touch, Conventional handling, Kinesthetic stimulation, Kangaroo Mother Care
NCT04560374 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Using Crochet Octopus in Reducing The Pain Developed During The Process of Heel Lance İn Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorMarmara UniversityRan2020 to 2020Enrolled100ConditionsProcedural PainArmscrochet octopus
NCT05453305 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Venopuncture in Pediatric Emergency Department Using Koala's Distraction Method. Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria AragónRan2021 to 2022Enrolled220ConditionsNursing Caries, Emergencies, Venous PunctureArmsControl group: Traditional venipuncture, on the stretcher., Intervention group: DAK method venipuncture, simulating a hug
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 163 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Non-pharmacological management of infant and young child procedural pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pain and distress outcomes in infants and children: a systematic review.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Parental experiences of providing skin-to-skin care to their newborn infant--part 2: a qualitative meta-synthesis.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2014
    Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca R Pillai RiddellDepartment of Psychology, York University, 4700 Keele Street, OUCH Laboratory, Atkinson College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M3J 1P3.
Nicole M Racine
Kara Turcotte
Lindsay S Uman
Rachel E Horton
Laila Din Osmun
Sara Ahola Kohut
Jessica Hillgrove Stuart
Bonnie Stevens
Alanna Gerwitz-Stern
York University · CAHospital for Sick Children · CAIzaak Walton Killam Health Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfant acute pain and distress is commonplace. Infancy is a period of exponential development. Unrelieved pain and distress can have implications across the lifespan.

objectivesTo assess the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for infant and child (up to three years) acute pain, excluding breastmilk, sucrose, and music. Analyses accounted for infant age (preterm, neonate, older) and pain response (pain reactivity, pain-related regulation). SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched CENTRAL in The Cochrane Library (2011, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2011), EMBASE (1980 to April 2011), PsycINFO (1967 to April 2011), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (1982 to 2011), Dissertation Abstracts International (1980 to 2011) and www.clinicaltrials.gov. We also searched reference lists and contacted researchers via electronic list-serves. SELECTION CRITERIA: Participants included infants from birth to three years. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or RCT cross-overs that had a no-treatment control comparison were eligible for inclusion in the analyses. We examined studies that met all inclusion criteria except for study design (e.g. had an active control) to qualitatively contextualize results. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We refined search strategies with three Cochrane-affiliated librarians. At least two review authors extracted and rated 51 articles. Study quality ratings were based on a scale by Yates and colleagues. We analyzed the standardized mean difference (SMD) using the generic inverse variance method. We also provided qualitative descriptions of 20 relevant but excluded studies. MAIN

resultsFifty-one studies, with 3396 participants, were analyzed. The most commonly studied acute procedures were heel-sticks (29 studies) and needles (n = 10 studies). The largest SMD for treatment improvement over control conditions on pain reactivity were: non-nutritive sucking-related interventions (preterm: SMD -0.42; 95% CI -0.68 to -0.15; neonate: SMD -1.45, 95% CI -2.34 to -0.57), kangaroo care (preterm: SMD -1.12, 95% CI -2.04 to -0.21), and swaddling/facilitated tucking (preterm: SMD -0.97; 95% CI -1.63 to -0.31). For immediate pain-related regulation, the largest SMDs were: non-nutritive sucking-related interventions (preterm: SMD -0.38; 95% CI -0.59 to -0.17; neonate: SMD -0.90, 95% CI -1.54 to -0.25), kangaroo care (SMD -0.77, 95% CI -1.50 to -0.03), swaddling/facilitated tucking (preterm: SMD -0.75; 95% CI -1.14 to -0.36), and rocking/holding (neonate: SMD -0.75; 95% CI -1.20 to -0.30). The presence of significant heterogeneity limited our confidence in the lack of findings for certain analyses. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is evidence that different non-pharmacological interventions can be used with preterms, neonates, and older infants to significantly manage pain behaviors associated with acutely painful procedures.

Indexed as

Pain ManagementAcute DiseaseChild, PreschoolHumansInfantInfant CareInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureNeedlesPainPuncturesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSucking Behavior

Identifiers

PMID21975752
OpenAlexW4251763335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.