SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2011
Fluoroquinolones for treating typhoid and paratyphoid fever (enteric fever).
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 126 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment of enteric fever (typhoid and paratyphoid fever) with cephalosporins.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Antimicrobials for treating symptomatic non-typhoidal Salmonella infection.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Treatment Response in Enteric Fever in an Era of Increasing Antimicrobial Resistance: An Individual Patient Data Analysis of 2092 Participants Enrolled into 4 Randomized, Controlled Trials in Nepal.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2017Trial
- Gatifloxacin versus ceftriaxone for uncomplicated enteric fever in Nepal: an open-label, two-centre, randomised controlled trial.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2016Trial
- Trial
- Gatifloxacin versus ofloxacin for the treatment of uncomplicated enteric fever in Nepal: an open-label, randomized, controlled trial.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2013Trial
- Re-emergence of Conventional Drug Susceptibility Amid Persistent Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Enteric Fever.Cureus · 2026Article
- Phase II multicentre double-blind randomised controlled trial of a Bivalent VaccInation againstBMJ open · 2026Article
- Paratyphoid fever and the genomics of Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi A in Taiwan.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Colorimetric CRISPR Biosensor: A Case Study with Salmonella Typhi.ACS sensors · 2025Article
- Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns and Prevalence ofInterdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Tackling salmonellosis: A comprehensive exploration of risks factors, impacts, and solutions.Open veterinary journal · 2024Review
- Typhoid fever.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023Review
- Electrochemical Sensor Based on the Hierarchical Carbon Nanocomposite for Highly Sensitive Ciprofloxacin Determination.Membranes · 2023Article
- What Should We Be Recommending for the Treatment of Enteric Fever?Open forum infectious diseases · 2023Article
- In vitro Efficacy Evaluation of Leading Brands of Ciprofloxacin Tablets Found in Bishoftu City AgainstInfection and drug resistance · 2023Article
- Typhoid fever, complicated by syncope due to relative bradycardia: A case report.SAGE open medical case reports · 2023Article
- The Effect of the Gallbladder Environment during Chronic Infection onMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- Changing Paradigms in Antibiotic Resistance inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Antibiotic susceptibility profile of bacterial isolates from febrile children under 5 years of age in Nanoro, Burkina Faso.Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTyphoid and paratyphoid are febrile illnesses, due to a bacterial infection, which remain common in many low- and middle-income countries. The World Health Organization (WHO) currently recommends the fluoroquinolone antibiotics in areas with known resistance to the older first-line antibiotics.
objectivesTo evaluate fluoroquinolone antibiotics for treating children and adults with enteric fever. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Cochrane Infectious Disease Group Specialized Register (February 2011); Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), published in The Cochrane Library (2011, Issue 2); MEDLINE (1966 to February 2011); EMBASE (1974 to February 2011); and LILACS (1982 to February 2011). We also searched the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) in February 2011. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials examining fluoroquinolone antibiotics, in people with blood, stool or bone marrow culture-confirmed enteric fever. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed the trial's methodological quality and extracted data. We calculated risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous data and mean difference for continuous data with 95% confidence intervals (CI).Comparative effectiveness has been interpreted in the context of; length of treatment, dose, year of study, known levels of antibiotic resistance, or proxy measures of resistance such as the failure rate in the comparator arm. MAIN
resultsTwenty-six studies, involving 3033 patients, are included in this review.Fluoroquinolones versus older antibiotics (chloramphenicol, co-trimoxazole, amoxicillin and ampicillin)In one study from Pakistan in 2003-04, high clinical failure rates were seen with both chloramphenicol and co-trimoxazole, although resistance was not confirmed microbiologically. A seven-day course of either ciprofloxacin or ofloxacin were found to be superior. Older studies of these comparisons failed to show a difference (six trials, 361 participants).In small studies conducted almost two decades ago, the fluoroquinolones were demonstrated to have fewer clinical failures than ampicillin and amoxicillin (two trials, 90 participants, RR 0.11, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.57).Fluoroquinolones versus current second-line options (ceftriaxone, cefalexin, and azithromycin)The two studies comparing a seven day course of oral fluoroquinolones with three days of intravenous ceftriaxone were too small to detect important differences between antibiotics should they exist (two trials, 89 participants).In Pakistan in 2003-04, no clinical or microbiological failures were seen with seven days of either ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin or cefixime (one trial, 139 participants). In Nepal in 2005, gatifloxacin reduced clinical failure and relapse compared to cefixime, despite a high prevalence of NaR in the study population (one trial, 158 participants, RR 0.04, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.31).Compared to a seven day course of azithromycin, a seven day course of ofloxacin had a higher rate of clinical failures in populations with both multi-drug resistance (MDR) and nalidixic acid resistance (NaR) enteric fever in Vietnam in 1998-2002 (two trials, 213 participants, RR 2.20, 95% CI 1.23 to 3.94). However, a more recent study from Vietnam in 2004-05, detected no difference between gatifloxacin and azithromycin with both drugs performing well (one trial, 287 participants). AUTHORS'
conclusionsGenerally, fluoroquinolones performed well in treating typhoid, and maybe superior to alternatives in some settings. However, we were unable to draw firm general conclusions on comparative contemporary effectiveness given that resistance changes over time, and many studies were small. Policy makers and clinicians need to consider local resistance patterns in choosing a fluoroquinolone or alternative.There is some evidence that the newest fluoroquinolone, gatifloxacin, remains effective in some regions where resistance to older fluoroquinolones has developed. However, the different fluoroquinolones have not been compared directly in trials in these settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.