ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2011
Molecular changes consistent with increased proliferation and invasion are common in rectal cancer.
Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- ARNTL2 knockdown suppressed the invasion and migration of colon carcinoma: decreased SMOC2-EMT expression through inactivation of PI3K/AKT pathway.American journal of translational research · 2020Article
- Oncoprotein Stathmin Modulates Sensitivity to Apoptosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells During Hepatitis C Viral Replication.Journal of cell death · 2018Article
- Or why translational research is vital for the future treatment of rectal cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survival in rectal cancer remains unchanged despite improved treatment modalities. Molecular biology may hold the key to new strategies. Gene expression abnormalities need identification in tumour specimens to identify targets for therapy. The impact of neoadjuvant therapy on induced gene expression changes needs to be assessed to distinguish the intrinsic tumour-specific changes from those changes that may be induced by neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS Gene expression changes were examined in 21 rectal tumours plus matched normal mucosa and cells exposed to 5-FU and gamma radiation, using DNA membrane arrays. These arrays contained 100 genes in common cancer pathways. The most commonly up-regulated gene, c-FOS, was quantified using real-time PCR. RESULTS c-FOS was the most commonly up-regulated gene, occurring in 7 of 21 samples (33%), all samples having a greater than 2-fold increase. SERPINE-1 was the second most commonly up-regulated gene with 6 of 21 samples showing up-regulation (29%). There was no clear correlation between up-regulation of c-FOS or SERPINE-1 and clinico-pathological data. Neither c-FOS nor SERPINE-1 gene expression was induced by 5-FU treatment or gamma irradiation in vitro, but MUC 18 was up-regulated by 5-FU treatment. This suggests that FOS and SERPINE-1 expression changes are specific to the tumour and will not arise as artefacts of neoadjuvant therapy. CONCLUSION The study suggests that c-FOS and SERPINE-1 may have important but as yet unclear roles in the tumour biology of rectal cancer but probably only represent a small part of the complex molecular biology of rectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.