ArticleBMC neurology2011
Disease-modifying drug initiation patterns in commercially insured multiple sclerosis patients: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC neurology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of a Quality Measure for Multiple Sclerosis Care: Disease-Modifying Therapy Initiation at the University of North Carolina's Outpatient Neurology Clinic.International journal of MS care · 2024Article
- Treatment Patterns by Race and Ethnicity in Newly Diagnosed Persons with Multiple Sclerosis.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2023Article
- Real-World Clinical and Economic Outcomes Among Persons With Multiple Sclerosis Initiating First- Versus Second- or Later-Line Treatment With Ocrelizumab.Neurology and therapy · 2023Article
- Evaluating Treatment Patterns, Relapses, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Costs Associated with Disease-Modifying Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis in DMT-Naïve Patients.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2021Article
- Treatment Patterns, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Costs Among Medicare Patients with Multiple Sclerosis in Relation to Disease-Modifying Therapy and Corticosteroid Treatment.Neurology and therapy · 2019Article
- Probability discounting of treatment decisions in multiple sclerosis: associations with disease knowledge, neuropsychiatric status, and adherence.Psychopharmacology · 2018Article
- Quantifying Differences in Health Care Consumption for the Management of Multiple Sclerosis Within Privately and Publicly Insured Health Care Programs.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2016Article
- Adherence to Disease-Modifying Therapies in Patients With MS: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2016Article
- Long-term persistence with injectable therapy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: an 18-year observational cohort study.PloS one · 2015Observational
- Retrospective US database analysis of persistence with glatiramer acetate vs. available disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis: 2001-2010.BMC neurology · 2014Article
- A pooled analysis of two phase 3 clinical trials of dalfampridine in patients with multiple sclerosis.International journal of MS care · 2014Article
- Article
- Treatment of multiple sclerosis in Germany: an analysis based on claims data of more than 30,000 patients.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2013Article
- Hospitalization rates and discharge status in multiple sclerosis.Multiple sclerosis international · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe goal of this research was to compare the demographics, clinical characteristics and treatment patterns for newly diagnosed multiple sclerosis (MS) patients in a commercial managed care population who received disease-modifying drug (DMD) therapy versus those not receiving DMD therapy.
methodsA retrospective cohort study using US administrative healthcare claims identified individuals newly diagnosed with MS (no prior MS diagnosis 12 months prior using ICD-9-CM 340) and ≥18 years old during 2001-2007 to characterize them based on demographics, clinical characteristics, and pharmacologic therapy for one year prior to and a minimum of one year post-index. The index date was the first MS diagnosis occurring in the study period. Follow-up of subjects was done by ICD-9-CM code identification and not by actual chart review. Multivariate analyses were conducted to adjust for confounding variables.
resultsPatients were followed for an average of 35.7±17.5 months after their index diagnosis. Forty-three percent (n=4,462) of incident patients received treatment with at least one of the DMDs during the post-index period. Treated patients were primarily in the younger age categories of 18-44 years of age, with DMD therapy initiated an average of 5.3±9.1 months after the index diagnosis. Once treatment was initiated, 27.7% discontinued DMD therapy after an average of 17.6±14.6 months, and 16.5% had treatment gaps in excess of 60 days.
conclusionsNearly 60% of newly-diagnosed MS patients in this commercial managed care population remained untreated while over a quarter of treated patients stopped therapy and one-sixth experienced treatment gaps despite the risk of disease progression or a return of pre-treatment disease activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.