Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21974901›Full record

ArticleBMC medical genomics2011

Bayesian probit regression model for the diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis: proof-of-principle.

Eric B Meltzer, William T Barry, Thomas A D'Amico, Robert D Davis, Shu S Lin, Mark W Onaitis, Lake D Morrison, Thomas A Sporn, Mark P Steele, Paul W Noble

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical genomics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Host mScientific reports · 2026
    Article
  9. Monocyte-Derived LGMNResearch (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. GTSE1-driven ZEB1 stabilization promotes pulmonary fibrosis through the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eric B MeltzerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
William T Barry
Thomas A D'Amico
Robert D Davis
Shu S Lin
Mark W Onaitis
Lake D Morrison
Thomas A Sporn
Mark P Steele
Paul W Noble
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University · US

Funding

MATRIX REGULATION OF FIBROPROLIFERATIVE LUNG DISEASEP50HL084917 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WRIGHT, JO RAE · 2006 to 2010
$13.2M
MECHANISMS OF MACROPHAGE ACTIVATION IN LUNG INFLAMMATIONR01HL060539 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI NOBLE, PAUL WESLEY · 1997 to 2019
$6.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS 5P50HL084917-05NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL060539
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe accurate diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a major clinical challenge. We developed a model to diagnose IPF by applying Bayesian probit regression (BPR) modelling to gene expression profiles of whole lung tissue.

methodsWhole lung tissue was obtained from patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) undergoing surgical lung biopsy or lung transplantation. Controls were obtained from normal organ donors. We performed cluster analyses to explore differences in our dataset. No significant difference was found between samples obtained from different lobes of the same patient. A significant difference was found between samples obtained at biopsy versus explant. Following preliminary analysis of the complete dataset, we selected three subsets for the development of diagnostic gene signatures: the first signature was developed from all IPF samples (as compared to controls); the second signature was developed from the subset of IPF samples obtained at biopsy; the third signature was developed from IPF explants. To assess the validity of each signature, we used an independent cohort of IPF and normal samples. Each signature was used to predict phenotype (IPF versus normal) in samples from the validation cohort. We compared the models' predictions to the true phenotype of each validation sample, and then calculated sensitivity, specificity and accuracy.

resultsSurprisingly, we found that all three signatures were reasonably valid predictors of diagnosis, with small differences in test sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy.

conclusionsThis study represents the first use of BPR on whole lung tissue; previously, BPR was primarily used to develop predictive models for cancer. This also represents the first report of an independently validated IPF gene expression signature. In summary, BPR is a promising tool for the development of gene expression signatures from non-neoplastic lung tissue. In the future, BPR might be used to develop definitive diagnostic gene signatures for IPF, prognostic gene signatures for IPF or gene signatures for other non-neoplastic lung disorders such as bronchiolitis obliterans.

Indexed as

AdultAgedArea Under CurveBayes TheoremCluster AnalysisCohort StudiesFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansIdiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisLungLung TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypePredictive Value of Tests

Identifiers

PMID21974901
PMCPMC3199230
OpenAlexW2163805477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.