Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21973271›Full record

Trial reportClinical pharmacokinetics2011

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol in morbidly obese patients.

Simone van Kralingen, Jeroen Diepstraten, Mariska Y M Peeters, Vera H M Deneer, Bert van Ramshorst, René J Wiezer, Eric P A van Dongen, Meindert Danhof, Catherijne A J Knibbe

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00395681 (Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Propofol in the Morbidly Obese Patient), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00395681 phase4completednot on this map

Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Propofol in the Morbidly Obese Patient

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt. Antonius HospitalRan2007 to 2008Enrolled20ConditionsMorbid ObesityArmsDiprivan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Propofol-associated QTc prolongation.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Simone van KralingenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
Jeroen Diepstraten
Mariska Y M Peeters
Vera H M Deneer
Bert van Ramshorst
René J Wiezer
Eric P A van Dongen
Meindert Danhof
Catherijne A J Knibbe

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesIn view of the increasing prevalence of morbidly obese patients, the influence of excessive total bodyweight (TBW) on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol was characterized in this study using bispectral index (BIS) values as a pharmacodynamic endpoint.

methodsA population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model was developed with the nonlinear mixed-effects modelling software NONMEM VI, on the basis of 491 blood samples from 20 morbidly obese patients (TBW range 98-167 kg) and 725 blood samples from 44 lean patients (TBW range 55-98 kg) from previously published studies. In addition, 2246 BIS values from the 20 morbidly obese patients were available for pharmacodynamic analysis.

resultsIn a three-compartment pharmacokinetic model, TBW proved to be the most predictive covariate for clearance from the central compartment (CL) in the 20 morbidly obese patients (CL 2.33 L/min × [TBW/70]^[0.72]). Similar results were obtained when the morbidly obese patients and the 44 lean patients were analysed together (CL 2.22 L/min × [TBW/70]^[0.67]). No covariates were identified for other pharmacokinetic parameters. The depth of anaesthesia in the morbidly obese patients was adequately described by a two-compartment biophase-distribution model with a sigmoid maximum possible effect (E(max)) pharmacodynamic model (concentration at half-maximum effect [EC(50)] 2.12 mg/L) without covariates.

conclusionWe developed a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model of propofol in morbidly obese patients, in which TBW proved to be the major determinant of clearance, using an allometric function with an exponent of 0.72. For the other pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters, no covariates could be identified. Trial registration number (clinicaltrials.gov): NCT00395681.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, IntravenousBody Mass IndexBody WeightConsciousness MonitorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidPropofolAnesthetics, IntravenousPropofol

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.