Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21973086›Full record

ArticleThe FEBS journal2011

Identification and verification of heat shock protein 60 as a potential serum marker for colorectal cancer.

Céline Hamelin, Emilie Cornut, Florence Poirier, Sylvie Pons, Corinne Beaulieu, Jean-Philippe Charrier, Hader Haïdous, Eddy Cotte, Claude Lambert, Françoise Piard and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The FEBS journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Molecular Chaperonin HSP60: Current Understanding and Future Prospects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Heat Shock Proteins and HSF1 in Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Heat shock proteins with an emphasis on HSP 60.Molecular biology reports · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The HSP Immune Network in Cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Proteomic Interrogation in Cancer Biomarker.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Céline HamelinImmunoproteomics Laboratory, Department of Biomarkers, bioMérieux, Marcy l'étoile, France.
Emilie Cornut
Florence Poirier
Sylvie Pons
Corinne Beaulieu
Jean-Philippe Charrier
Hader Haïdous
Eddy Cotte
Claude Lambert
Françoise Piard
Yasemin Ataman-Önal
Geneviève Choquet-Kastylevsky
bioMérieux (France) · FRLaboratoire de Biophotonique et Pharmacologie · FRMaison des Sciences de l’Homme de Dijon · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major public health issue worldwide, and novel tumor markers may contribute to its efficient management by helping in early detection, prognosis or surveillance of disease. The aim of our study was to identify new serum biomarkers for CRC, and we followed a phased biomarker discovery and validation process to obtain an accurate preliminary assessment of potential clinical utility. We compared colonic tumors and matched normal tissue from 15 CRC patients, using two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE), and identified 17 proteins that had significant differential expression. These results were further confirmed by western blotting for heat shock protein (HSP) 60, glutathione-S-transferase Pi, α-enolase, T-complex protein 1 subunit β, and leukocyte elastase inhibitor, and by immunohistochemistry for HSP60. Using mAbs raised against HSP60, we developed a reliable (precision of 5-15%) and sensitive (0.3 ng·mL(-1)) immunoassay for the detection of HSP60 in serum. Elevated levels of HSP60 were found in serum from CRC patients in two independent cohorts; the receiver-operating characteristic curve obtained in 112 patients with CRC and 90 healthy controls had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.70, which was identical to the AUC of carcinoembryonic antigen. Combination of serum markers improved clinical performance: the AUC of a three-marker logistic regression model combining HSP60, carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 reached 0.77. Serum HSP60 appeared to be more specific for late-stage CRC; therefore, future studies should evaluate its utility for determining prognosis or monitoring therapy rather than early detection.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBlotting, WesternCA-19-9 AntigenCarcinoembryonic AntigenChaperonin 60Colorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityTwo-Dimensional Difference Gel ElectrophoresisBiomarkers, TumorCA-19-9 AntigenCarcinoembryonic AntigenChaperonin 60

Identifiers

PMID21973086
PMCPMC3265716
OpenAlexW1502349162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.