Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21972246›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2012

Viable Staphylococcus aureus quantitation using ¹⁵N metabolically labeled bacteriophage amplification coupled with a multiple reaction monitoring proteomic workflow.

Carrie L Pierce, Jon C Rees, Facundo M Fernández, John R Barr

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Proteomic Approach for Extracting Cytoplasmic Proteins fromJournal of molecular biology research · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Prevention of bacterial foodborne disease using nanobiotechnology.Nanotechnology, science and applications · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carrie L PierceNational Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, MS F-50, Atlanta, GA 30341; School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332.
Jon C ReesNational Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, MS F-50, Atlanta, GA 30341.
Facundo M FernándezSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332.
John R BarrNational Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, MS F-50, Atlanta, GA 30341. Electronic address: JBarr@cdc.gov.
Georgia Institute of Technology · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USNational Center for Environmental Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A multiple reaction monitoring liquid chromatography method with tandem mass spectrometric detection for quantitation of Staphylococcus aureus via phage amplification detection is described. This phage amplification detection method enables rapid and accurate quantitation of viable S. aureus by detecting an amplified capsid protein from a specific phage. A known amount of metabolically labeled (15)N reference bacteriophage, utilized as the input phage and as the internal standard for quantitation, was spiked into S. aureus samples. Following a 2-h incubation, the sample was subjected to a 3-min rapid trypsin digest and analyzed by high-throughput liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometric detection targeting peptides unique to both the (15)N (input phage) and (14)N (progeny phage) capsid proteins. Quantitation was achieved by comparing peak areas of target peptides from the metabolically labeled (15)N bacteriophage peptide internal standard with that of the wild-type (14)N peptides that were produced by phage amplification and subsequent digestion when the host bacteria was present. This approach is based on the fact that a labeled species differs from the unlabeled one in terms of its mass but exhibits almost identical chemical properties such as ion yields and retention times. A 6-point calibration curve for S. aureus concentration was constructed with standards ranging from 5.0 × 10(4) colony forming units (CFU) ml(-1) to 2.0 × 10(6) CFU ml(-1), with the (15)N reference phage spiked at a concentration of 1.0 × 10(9) plaque forming units (PFU) ml(-1). Amplification with (15)N bacteriophage coupled with LC-MS/MS detection offers speed (3 h total analysis time), sensitivity (LOD: < 5.0 × 10(4) CFU ml(-1)), accuracy, and precision for quantitation of S. aureus.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesChromatography, LiquidColony Count, MicrobialIsotope LabelingNitrogen IsotopesProteomicsStaphylococcus aureusTandem Mass SpectrometryNitrogen Isotopes

Identifiers

PMID21972246
PMCPMC3270108
OpenAlexW2126962070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.