Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2197222›Full record

ReviewInfection1990

Review of available trials of selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD).

H K van Saene, C P Stoutenbeek, A A Gilbertson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Infection, 1990. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

H K van SaeneDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Liverpool, UK.
C P Stoutenbeek
A A Gilbertson
OLVG · NLRoyal Liverpool University Hospital · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eighteen studies on Selective Decontamination of the Digestive Tract (SDD) have been published up to now. A statistically significant reduction of infection rate was found in fourteen out of the fifteen controlled studies. Although all the studies were designed to evaluate infection-related morbidity as the end point, ten centres have reported fatality rates. Six centres out of the ten showed a statistically significant reduction in mortality in patients receiving SDD versus control. A recent French study describes the eradication of an outbreak of a multi-resistant Klebsiella with SDD. The Paris trial suggests a major impact of the SDD maneuver on the ICU ecology. Emergence of resistance to the SDD agents among gram-positive cocci has been described, although the clinical impact of this antibiotic side effect has not been reported so far. There are three indications for SDD, as follows: (i) trauma patients; (ii) liver transplant recipients and (iii) outbreaks of multi-resistant organisms.

Indexed as

DecontaminationDigestive SystemDrug Resistance, MicrobialHumansIntensive Care Units

Identifiers

PMID2197222
OpenAlexW50130653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.