ArticleGenome biology and evolution2011
Inference of gain and loss events from phyletic patterns using stochastic mapping and maximum parsimony--a simulation study.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine learning enables prediction of metabolic system evolution in bacteria.Science advances · 2023Pooled it
- Why did some viruses evolve to be giants while others did not?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Template Switching as a Driver of Promoter Evolution in Yeast: Case Study of the GRE2 Gene.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Phylogenetic Distribution and Evolution of Type VI Secretion System in the GenusFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction for Exploring Alkaloid Evolution.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Article
- Evolution of Microbial Genomics: Conceptual Shifts over a Quarter Century.Trends in microbiology · 2021Review
- Mirage: estimation of ancestral gene-copy numbers by considering different evolutionary patterns among gene families.Bioinformatics advances · 2021Article
- Genomic diversifications of five Gossypium allopolyploid species and their impact on cotton improvement.Nature genetics · 2020Article
- Article
- Limited DNA Repair Gene Repertoire in Ascomycete Yeast Revealed by Comparative Genomics.Genome biology and evolution · 2019Article
- Gene gain and loss push prokaryotes beyond the homologous recombination barrier and accelerate genome sequence divergence.Nature communications · 2019Article
- A multi-scale coevolutionary approach to predict interactions between protein domains.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- M1CR0B1AL1Z3R-a user-friendly web server for the analysis of large-scale microbial genomics data.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- Rapid turnover of life-cycle-related genes in the brown algae.Genome biology · 2019Article
- MicroRNA duplication accelerates the recruitment of new targets during vertebrate evolution.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2018Article
- Multiple evolutionary origins of giant viruses.F1000Research · 2018Review
- Comparative genomics reveals genes significantly associated with woody hosts in the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae.Molecular plant pathology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial evolution is characterized by frequent gain and loss events of gene families. These events can be inferred from phyletic pattern data-a compact representation of gene family repertoire across multiple genomes. The maximum parsimony paradigm is a classical and prevalent approach for the detection of gene family gains and losses mapped on specific branches. We and others have previously developed probabilistic models that aim to account for the gain and loss stochastic dynamics. These models are a critical component of a methodology termed stochastic mapping, in which probabilities and expectations of gain and loss events are estimated for each branch of an underlying phylogenetic tree. In this work, we present a phyletic pattern simulator in which the gain and loss dynamics are assumed to follow a continuous-time Markov chain along the tree. Various models and options are implemented to make the simulation software useful for a large number of studies in which binary (presence/absence) data are analyzed. Using this simulation software, we compared the ability of the maximum parsimony and the stochastic mapping approaches to accurately detect gain and loss events along the tree. Our simulations cover a large array of evolutionary scenarios in terms of the propensities for gene family gains and losses and the variability of these propensities among gene families. Although in all simulation schemes, both methods obtain relatively low levels of false positive rates, stochastic mapping outperforms maximum parsimony in terms of true positive rates. We further studied the factors that influence the performance of both methods. We find, for example, that the accuracy of maximum parsimony inference is substantially reduced when the goal is to map gain and loss events along internal branches of the phylogenetic tree. Furthermore, the accuracy of stochastic mapping is reduced with smaller data sets (limited number of gene families) due to unreliable estimation of branch lengths. Our simulator and simulation results are additionally relevant for the analysis of other types of binary-coded data, such as the existence of homologues restriction sites, gaps, and introns, to name a few. Both the simulation software and the inference methodology are freely available at a user-friendly server: http://gloome.tau.ac.il/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.