Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21971256›Full record

ArticleAcademic radiology2011

Disposition of ultrasound sensitive polymeric drug carrier in a rat hepatocellular carcinoma model.

Michael C Cochran, John R Eisenbrey, Michael C Soulen, Susan M Schultz, Richard O Ouma, Sarah B White, Emma E Furth, Margaret A Wheatley

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic radiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Application of Ultrasound Combined with Microbubbles for Cancer Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Ultrasound-responsive polymer-based drug delivery systems.Drug delivery and translational research · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. PBCA-based polymeric microbubbles for molecular imaging and drug delivery.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2017
    Article
  15. Ultrasound-guided drug delivery in cancer.Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) · 2017
    Review
  16. Sonoporation enhances liposome accumulation and penetration in tumors with low EPR.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Nanoparticle Loaded Polymeric Microbubbles as Contrast Agents for Multimodal Imaging.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2015
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael C CochranSchool of Biomedical Engineering Science and Health Systems, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
John R Eisenbrey
Michael C Soulen
Susan M Schultz
Richard O Ouma
Sarah B White
Emma E Furth
Margaret A Wheatley
Drexel University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW CLASS OF ULTRASOUND CONTRAST AGENTSR01HL052901 · NHLBI · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI WHEATLEY, MARGARET A. · 1994 to 2009
$1.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL52901NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL052901
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE AND

objectivesA doxorubicin-loaded microbubble has been developed that can be destroyed with focused ultrasound resulting in fragments, or "nanoshards" capable of escaping through the leaky tumor vasculature, promoting accumulation within the interstitium. This study uses a rat liver cancer model to examine the biodistribution and tumoral delivery of this microbubble platform compared with de novo drug-loaded polymer nanoparticles and free doxorubicin. MATERIALS AND

methodsMicrobubbles (1.8 μm) and 217-nm nanoparticles were prepared containing 14-C labeled doxorubicin. Microbubbles, nanoparticles, a combination of the two, or free doxorubicin were administered intravenously in rats bearing hepatomas, concomitant with tumor insonation. Doxorubicin levels in plasma, organs, and tumors were quantified after 4 hours and 7 and 14 days. Tumors were measured on sacrifice and evaluated with autoradiography and histology.

resultsAnimals treated with microbubbles had significantly lower plasma doxorubicin concentrations (0.466 ± 0.068%/mL) compared with free doxorubicin (3.033 ± 0.612%/mL, P = .0019). Drug levels in the myocardium were significantly lower in animals treated with microbubbles compared to free doxorubicin (0.168%/g tissue vs. 0.320%/g, P = .0088). Tumors treated with microbubbles showed significantly higher drug levels than tumors treated with free doxorubicin (2.491 ± 0.501 %/g vs. 0.373 ± 0.087 %/g, P = .0472). These tumors showed significantly less growth than tumors treated with free doxorubicin (P = .0390).

conclusionsDoxorubicin loaded microbubbles triggered with ultrasound provided enhanced, sustained drug delivery to tumors, reduced plasma and myocardium doxorubicin levels, and arresting tumor growth. The results suggest that in situ generation of nano particles provides a superior treatment over injection of free drug and also de novo synthesized nanoparticles.

Indexed as

Drug CarriersAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsAntibiotics, AntineoplasticAutoradiographyCarbon RadioisotopesCarcinoma, HepatocellularDisease Models, AnimalDoxorubicinLiver Neoplasms, ExperimentalMicrobubblesNanoparticlesPolymersRatsTumor Cells, CulturedAntibiotics, AntineoplasticCarbon RadioisotopesDoxorubicinDrug CarriersPolymers

Identifiers

PMID21971256
PMCPMC3188389
OpenAlexW2035625867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.