Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21971024›Full record

ArticleQuality management in health care

Measuring sustainability within the Veterans Administration Mental Health System Redesign initiative.

James H Ford, Dean Krahn, Meg Wise, Karen Anderson Oliver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality management in health care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Organizational mediators of sustainability in a randomized controlled trial.Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Family care map: Sustaining family-centered care in Polytrauma Rehabilitation Centers.Journal of rehabilitation research and development · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James H FordCenter for Health Enhancement System Studies, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA. jay.ford@chess.wisc.edu
Dean Krahn
Meg Wise
Karen Anderson Oliver

Funding

RCT Evaluating Improvement Strategies for Addiction TxR01DA020832 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GUSTAFSON, DAVID H · 2006 to 2010
$7.3M
NIDA NIH HHS 5 R01 DA020832NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA020832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine how attributes affecting sustainability differ across Veterans Health Administration organizational components and by staff characteristics. SUBJECTS: Surveys of 870 change team members and 50 staff interviews within the Veterans Affairs' Mental Health System Redesign initiative.

methodsA 1-way ANOVA with a Tukey post hoc test examined differences in sustainability by Veteran Integrated Service Networks, job classification, and tenure from staff survey data of the Sustainability Index. Qualitative interviews used an iterative process to identify "a priori" and "in vivo" themes. A simple stepwise linear regression explored predictors of sustainability.

resultsSustainability differed across Veteran Integrated Service Networks and staff tenure. Job classification differences existed for the following: (1) benefits and credibility of the change and (2) staff involvement and attitudes toward change. Sustainability barriers were staff and institutional resistance and nonsupportive leadership. Facilitators were commitment to veterans, strong leadership, and use of quality improvement tools. Sustainability predictors were outcomes tracking, regular reporting, and use of Plan, Do, Study, Adjust cycles.

conclusionsCreating homogeneous implementation and sustainability processes across a national health system is difficult. Despite the Veterans Affairs' best evidence-based implementation efforts, there was significant variance. Locally tailored interventions might better support sustainability than "one-size-fits-all" approaches. Further research is needed to understand how participation in a quality improvement collaborative affects sustainability.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedFemaleHumansMaleMental Health ServicesOccupationsTime FactorsUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs

Identifiers

PMID21971024
PMCPMC3188394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.