Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21970901›Full record

ArticleExperimental eye research2011

Interaction between mechanical and osmotic forces in the isolated rabbit lens.

Aldo C Zamudio, Oscar A Candia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental eye research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Pharmacologically stimulated pupil and accommodative changes in Guinea pigs.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aldo C ZamudioDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Fifth Avenue and 100th Street, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Oscar A Candia

Funding

INTERDISCIPLINARY VISION RESEARCH CENTER (CORE)P30EY001867 · NEI · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI CANDIA, OSCAR A · 1985 to 2011
$4.7M
ELECTROLYTE/FLUID TRANSPORT IN OCULAR TISSUER01EY000160 · NEI · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI CANDIA, OSCAR A · 1985 to 2013
$4.2M
NEI NIH HHS EY00160NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001867NEI NIH HHS R01 EY000160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on our previous work showing that cow and rabbit lenses isolated with their accommodation anatomical components intact change volume during simulated accommodation in vitro, and that hyposmolality and hyperosmolality also produce volume changes, we tested the idea that exerting these forces simultaneously may add or counteract each other. Further, we attempted to find a point at which osmotic and mechanical forces may cancel each other. Using previously described methodology, we found that combined stretching and anisotonic conditions applied to a lens always produced less of a volume change than that observed on its paired lens from the fellow eye that was only subjected to anisotonic conditions. Our results suggest that a stretching force that increases the equatorial diameter by 0.4% and reduces the lens volume by 1.8% could be canceled by a hyposmotic force of about -20 to -30 mOsM. Counter-intuitively, lenses that were subjected to stretching and hyperosmolality had less volume decrease than their paired lenses only exposed to hypertonicity. This latter observation is likely due to the prevention by the mechanical stretching forces of the shortening of the equatorial diameter, which normally occurs in hypertonic media.

Indexed as

Mechanotransduction, CellularAccommodation, OcularAnimalsFemaleHypertonic SolutionsHypotonic SolutionsIn Vitro TechniquesLens, CrystallineOrgan SizeOsmotic PressureRabbitsStress, MechanicalHypertonic SolutionsHypotonic Solutions

Identifiers

PMID21970901
PMCPMC3225735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.