Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21970880›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2011

Ki 67 is a major, but not the sole determinant of Oncotype Dx recurrence score.

S Sahebjam, R Aloyz, D Pilavdzic, M-L Brisson, C Ferrario, N Bouganim, V Cohen, W H Miller, L C Panasci

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. ERBB2 mutation is associated with sustained tumor cell proliferation after short-term preoperative endocrine therapy in early lobular breast cancer.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

S SahebjamDepartment of Medical Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada.
R Aloyz
D Pilavdzic
M-L Brisson
C Ferrario
N Bouganim
V Cohen
W H Miller
L C Panasci

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmunohistological assessment of Ki 67 expression is less expensive than Oncotype Dx, which is currently used to identify patients with lymph node-negative breast cancer, who will benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

methodsThe relationship of immunohistologically measured Ki 67 to Oncotype DX recurrence score (RS) was examined in 53 cases of T1-2 N0 M0 (oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2/neu negative) breast cancer.

resultsThere was a strong linear correlation between Ki 67 value and the Oncotype Dx RS. All patients in the low Ki 67 group (Ki 67 of ≤ 10%) had Oncotype Dx RSs of low or intermediate risk. The vast majority of patients (93.8%) in the high-Ki 67 group (Ki 67 ≥ 25%) had oncotype RSs of high or intermediate risk.

conclusionKi 67 proliferation value is a major, but not the sole determinant of Oncotype Dx score.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingRecurrenceBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansKi-67 AntigenPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionBiomarkers, TumorKi-67 Antigen

Identifiers

PMID21970880
PMCPMC3241562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.