Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21970872›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology2011

Risks versus benefits of gastrointestinal endoscopy during pregnancy.

Mitchell S Cappell

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. ACG Clinical Guideline: Liver Disease and Pregnancy.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2016
    Guideline
  3. Safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Up-to-date literature review and issues of sedation during digestive endoscopy.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2023
    Review
  7. Utility of the Novel SpyGlassGE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2022
    Article
  8. Pregnancy and Autoimmune Disease.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Fulminant ulcerative colitis in a healthy pregnant woman.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015
    Article
  15. IBD: reproductive health, pregnancy and lactation.Frontline gastroenterology · 2015
    Review
  16. Gastrointestinal endoscopy in pregnancy.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Gastrointestinal endoscopy in the pregnant woman.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2014
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Fetal radiation exposure: Is monitoring really needed?World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mitchell S CappellDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, MOB 233, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI 48073, USA. mscappell@yahoo.com

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although gastrointestinal endoscopy is generally safe, its safety must be separately analyzed during pregnancy with regard to fetal safety. Fetal risks from endoscopic medications are minimized by avoiding FDA category D drugs, minimizing endoscopic medications, and anesthesiologist attendance at endoscopy. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy seems to be relatively safe for the fetus and may be performed when strongly indicated during pregnancy. Despite limited clinical data, endoscopic banding of esophageal varices and endoscopic hemostasis of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding seems justifiable during pregnancy. Flexible sigmoidoscopy during pregnancy also appears to be relatively safe for the fetus and may be performed when strongly indicated. Colonoscopy may be considered in pregnant patients during the second trimester if there is a strong indication. Data on colonoscopy during the other trimesters are limited. Therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography seems to be relatively safe during pregnancy and should be performed for strong indications (for example, complicated choledocholithiasis). Endoscopic safety precautions during pregnancy include the performance of endoscopy in hospital by an expert endoscopist and only when strongly indicated, deferral of endoscopy to the second trimester whenever possible, and obstetric consultation.

Indexed as

Endoscopy, Digestive SystemFemaleGastrointestinal DiseasesHumansPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsRisk Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.