Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21970640›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2011

Developing high performance lipoprotein density profiling for use in clinical studies relating to cardiovascular disease.

Craig D Larner, Ronald R Henriquez, Jeffrey D Johnson, Ronald D Macfarlane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Altered lipoprotein profiles in cats with hepatic lipidosis.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2019
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Evaluation of density gradient ultracentrifugation serum lipoprotein profiles in healthy dogs and dogs with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Craig D LarnerDepartment of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, 3255 TAMU, College Station, Texas 77843-3255, United States.
Ronald R Henriquez
Jeffrey D Johnson
Ronald D Macfarlane

Funding

Lipoprotein Density Profiling for Clinical StudiesR01HL068794 · NHLBI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM · PI MACFARLANE, RONALD D · 2003 to 2011
$1.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL068794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early detection of the beginning stage of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is an approach to prevention because the process is reversible at this stage. Consequently, several methods for screening for CVD have been introduced in recent years incorporating different analytical methods for characterizing the population of blood-borne lipoprotein subclasses. The gold standard method for lipoprotein subclassification is based on lipoprotein density measured by sedimentation equilibrium using the ultracentrifuge. However, this method has not been adopted for clinical studies because of difficulties in achieving the precision required for distinguishing individuals with and without CVD particularly when statistical classification methods are used. The objective of this study was to identify and improve the major factors that influence the precision of measurement of lipoprotein density profile by sedimentation equilibrium analysis and labeling with a fluorescent probe. The study has two phases, each contributing to precision. The first phase focuses on the ultracentrifugation-related variables, and the second phase addresses those factors involved in converting the fluorescent lipoprotein density profile to a digital format compatible with statistical analysis. The overall improvement in precision was on the order of a factor of 5, sufficient to be effectively applied to ongoing classification studies relating to CVD risk assessment.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesHumansLipoproteinsRisk AssessmentSensitivity and SpecificityUltracentrifugationLipoproteins

Identifiers

PMID21970640
PMCPMC3220625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.