Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21970307›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging2011

Medicare Part D and quality of prescription medication use in older adults.

Denys T Lau, Becky A Briesacher, Daniel R Touchette, JoAnn Stubbings, Judy H Ng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Impact of drug policy on regional trends in ezetimibe use.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2014
    Observational
  10. Potential effects of racial and ethnic disparities in meeting Medicare medication therapy management eligibility criteria.Journal of pharmaceutical health services research : an official journal of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain · 2014
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Pharmaceutical policies used by private health insurance companies in Saudi Arabia.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2013
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Denys T LauDepartment of Pharmacy Administration, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. DTLau@uic.edu
Becky A Briesacher
Daniel R Touchette
JoAnn Stubbings
Judy H Ng

Funding

Cost-related Underuse of Medications and the Health of Older AdultsK01AG031836 · NIA · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI BRIESACHER, BECKY A · 2008 to 2012
$679k
Caregiving Skills in Effective Medication Management for Hospice PatientsK01AG027295 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI LAU, DENYS · 2007 to 2011
$611k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG027295NIA NIH HHS K01AG027295NIA NIH HHS K01 AG031836NIA NIH HHS K01AG031836
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2006, the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services implemented Medicare Part D to provide outpatient prescription drug insurance to disabled and older adults. In creating Part D, a key provision to address quality included medication therapy management (MTM) programmes designed to increase proper and safe use of medications among targeted Part D beneficiaries. A preponderance of evidence shows that Part D has increased medication affordability and accessibility; however, what remains less clear is whether it has improved the quality of medication use and optimized health outcomes. Now in its sixth year, Part D is undergoing its first major revision, with the gradual elimination of the coverage gap by 2020. Therefore, now is a good time to review the accumulated evidence on the impact of Part D and MTM programmes on the quality of medication use to help inform future policy decisions and research directions. In this review, we found that Part D's net effect on quality of medication use has mainly been positive. Cost-related medication nonadherence improved moderately and there were fewer than expected treatment interruptions. However, vulnerable subgroups, such as sicker and dual-eligible beneficiaries, experienced lags in improvement. Beneficiaries who entered the coverage gap consistently experienced interruptions and displayed worsening medication adherence after entering the gap, with generic-only gap drug coverage offering limited benefit. Such findings can serve as baseline information as the coverage gap phases out. Limited availability of data is the greatest barrier to research into Part D. Part D's overall effect on health outcomes and adverse medical events, such as hospitalizations, is inconclusive because of inadequate evidence to date. Similarly, no evaluation of quality of medication use is available with respect to utilization management strategies and MTM programmes delivered under Part D. Future research will need to further examine the added value of Part D and address whether Part D optimizes health outcomes in the Medicare population. As the current economic recession increases the pressure to cut costs, the effect of future spending restrictions, such as restrictions on coverage subsidies, will also be of special concern.

Indexed as

AgedDrug MonitoringHumansMedicare Part DMedication Therapy ManagementPrescription DrugsQuality ControlUnited StatesPrescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID21970307
PMCPMC3298545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.