ReviewDrugs & aging2011
Medicare Part D and quality of prescription medication use in older adults.
Review in Drugs & aging, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Medicare part D and long-term care: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.Drugs & aging · 2013Pooled it
- Medicare Part D plan generosity and medication use among dual-eligible nursing home residents.Medical care · 2013Trial
- Scope-of-Practice for Nurse Practitioners and Adherence to Medications for Chronic Illness in Primary Care.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Article
- Gout is associated with an increased risk for incident heart failure among older adults: the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) cohort study.Arthritis research & therapy · 2020Article
- Article
- Changing Patient Perceptions of MTM: Determining an Effective Method of Education.Innovations in pharmacy · 2018Article
- A renewed Medication Adherence Alliance call to action: harnessing momentum to address medication nonadherence in the United States.Patient preference and adherence · 2016Article
- Pharmaceutical Cost-Saving Strategies and their Association with Medication Adherence in a Medicare Supplement Population.Journal of general internal medicine · 2015Article
- Impact of drug policy on regional trends in ezetimibe use.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2014Observational
- Potential effects of racial and ethnic disparities in meeting Medicare medication therapy management eligibility criteria.Journal of pharmaceutical health services research : an official journal of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain · 2014Article
- How Medicare Part D benefit phases affect adherence with evidence-based medications following acute myocardial infarction.Health services research · 2013Article
- Pharmaceutical policies used by private health insurance companies in Saudi Arabia.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2013Article
- Cost-related nonadherence by medication type among Medicare Part D beneficiaries with diabetes.Medical care · 2013Article
- Medicare part D research and policy highlights, 2012: impact and insights.Clinical therapeutics · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In 2006, the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services implemented Medicare Part D to provide outpatient prescription drug insurance to disabled and older adults. In creating Part D, a key provision to address quality included medication therapy management (MTM) programmes designed to increase proper and safe use of medications among targeted Part D beneficiaries. A preponderance of evidence shows that Part D has increased medication affordability and accessibility; however, what remains less clear is whether it has improved the quality of medication use and optimized health outcomes. Now in its sixth year, Part D is undergoing its first major revision, with the gradual elimination of the coverage gap by 2020. Therefore, now is a good time to review the accumulated evidence on the impact of Part D and MTM programmes on the quality of medication use to help inform future policy decisions and research directions. In this review, we found that Part D's net effect on quality of medication use has mainly been positive. Cost-related medication nonadherence improved moderately and there were fewer than expected treatment interruptions. However, vulnerable subgroups, such as sicker and dual-eligible beneficiaries, experienced lags in improvement. Beneficiaries who entered the coverage gap consistently experienced interruptions and displayed worsening medication adherence after entering the gap, with generic-only gap drug coverage offering limited benefit. Such findings can serve as baseline information as the coverage gap phases out. Limited availability of data is the greatest barrier to research into Part D. Part D's overall effect on health outcomes and adverse medical events, such as hospitalizations, is inconclusive because of inadequate evidence to date. Similarly, no evaluation of quality of medication use is available with respect to utilization management strategies and MTM programmes delivered under Part D. Future research will need to further examine the added value of Part D and address whether Part D optimizes health outcomes in the Medicare population. As the current economic recession increases the pressure to cut costs, the effect of future spending restrictions, such as restrictions on coverage subsidies, will also be of special concern.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.