Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21969920›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2011

Implementation of whole slide imaging in surgical pathology: A value added approach.

Mike Isaacs, Jochen K Lennerz, Stacey Yates, Walter Clermont, Joan Rossi, John D Pfeifer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Implementing the DICOM Standard for Digital Pathology.Journal of pathology informatics · 2018
    Article
  10. Routine Digital Pathology Workflow: The Catania Experience.Journal of pathology informatics · 2017
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Applicability of digital analysis and imaging technology in neuropathology assessment.Neuropathology : official journal of the Japanese Society of Neuropathology · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. 21(st) century workflow: A proposal.Journal of pathology informatics · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mike IsaacsDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Jochen K Lennerz
Stacey Yates
Walter Clermont
Joan Rossi
John D Pfeifer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhole slide imaging (WSI) makes it possible to capture images of an entire histological slide. WSI has established roles in surgical pathology, including support of off-site frozen section interpretation, primary diagnosis, educational activities, and laboratory quality assurance (QA) activities. Analyses of the cost of WSI have traditionally been based solely on direct costs and diagnostic accuracy; however, these types of analyses largely ignore workflow and cost issues that arise as a result of redundancy, the need for additional staffing, and customized software development when WSI is integrated into routine diagnostic surgical pathology. The pre-scan, scan, and post-scan costs; quality control and QA costs; and IT process costs can be significant, and consequently, pathology groups can find it difficult to perform a realistic cost-benefit analysis of adding WSI to their practice. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this paper, we report a "value added" approach developed to guide our decisions regarding integration of WSI into surgical pathology practice. The approach focuses on specific operational measures (cost, time, and enhanced patient care) and practice settings (clinical, education, and research) to identify routine activities in which the addition of WSI can provide improvements.

resultsWhen applied to our academic pathology group practice, the value added approach resulted in expanded and improved operations, as demonstrated by outcome based measures.

conclusionA value added can be used to perform a realistic cost-benefit analysis of integrating WSI into routine surgical pathology practice.

Indexed as

Digital pathologytelepathologywhole slide imaging

Identifiers

PMID21969920
PMCPMC3169923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.