ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2011
Can generalism help revive the primary healthcare vision?
Article in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cognition in the Clinic: The Case for Cognitive Ethnography in Family Medicine.Family medicine · 2026Article
- Colorado integrated behavioral health plus (CIBH+): aligning behavioral health within a generalist approach to primary care.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- William Pickles Lecture 2013: For they are born for another time.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014Article
- 4th annual primary care ethics conference: ethics education and lifelong learning.London journal of primary care · 2014Article
- Examining the practice of generalist expertise: a qualitative study identifying constraints and solutions.JRSM short reports · 2013Article
- Generalist solutions to complex problems: generating practice-based evidence--the example of managing multi-morbidity.BMC family practice · 2013Article
- Dismantling Lord Moran's ladder: the primary care expert generalist.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.