Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21968991›Full record

ArticleNature cell biology2011

A brief history of error.

Andrew W Murray

Abstract readHistorical Article
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature cell biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Disassembly of mitotic checkpoint complexes by the joint action of the AAA-ATPase TRIP13 and p31(comet).Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  15. Meiosis I: when chromosomes undergo extreme makeover.Current opinion in cell biology · 2013
    Review
  16. Mitotic inhibition of clathrin-mediated endocytosis.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2013
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Roles of different pools of the mitotic checkpoint complex and the mechanisms of their disassembly.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Andrew W MurrayHarvard University, Molecular and Cellular Biology, 52 Oxford Street, Northwest Science Building, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA. awm@mcb.harvard.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spindle checkpoint monitors chromosome alignment on the mitotic and meiotic spindle. When the checkpoint detects errors, it arrests progress of the cell cycle while it attempts to correct the mistakes. This perspective will present a brief history summarizing what we know about the checkpoint, and a list of questions we must answer before we understand it.

Indexed as

Cell CycleChromosomesDNA DamageSpindle ApparatusAnimalsCell BiologyCell Cycle CheckpointsHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID21968991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.