Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21968859›Full record

ReviewThe journal of nutrition, health & aging2011

Reducing "iatrogenic disability" in the hospitalized frail elderly.

C Lafont, S Gérard, T Voisin, M Pahor, B Vellas, Members of I.A.G.G./A.M.P.A Task Force

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 198 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Exercise for acutely hospitalised older medical patients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

C LafontGérontopôle, Department of Geriatric Medicine, CHU Toulouse, France.
S Gérard
T Voisin
M Pahor
B Vellas
Members of I.A.G.G./A.M.P.A Task Force
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse · FRInstitute on Aging · USUniversité de Toulouse · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospitalization is the first cause of functional decline in the elderly: 30 to 60% of elderly patients lose some independence in basic activities of daily living (ADL) during a stay in hospital. This loss of independence results from the acute condition that led to admission, but is also related to the mode of management.

objectiveThis paper is a review of the literature on functional decline in elderly hospitalized patients. It is the first stage in a project aiming to prevent dependence that is induced during the course of care.

methodsDuring a 2-day workshop in Monaco, a task force of 20 international experts discussed and defined the concept of "iatrogenic disability".

results1- "Iatrogenic disability" was defined by the task force as the avoidable dependence which often occurs during the course of care. It involves three components that interact and have a cumulative effect: a) the patient's pre-existing frailty, b) the severity of the disorder that led to the patient's admission, and lastly c) the hospital structure and the process of care. 2- The prevention of "iatrogenic disability" involves successive stages. - becoming aware that hospitalization may induce dependence. Epidemiological studies have identified at-risk populations by the use of composite scores (HARP, ISAR, SHERPA, COMPRI, etc). - considering that functional decline is not a fatality. Quality references have already been defined. Interventions to prevent dependence in targeted populations have been set up: simple geriatric consultation teams, single-factor interventions (aimed for example at mobility, delirium, iatrogenic disorders) or multidomain interventions (such as GEM and ACE units, HELP, Fast Track, NICHE). These interventions are essentially centered on the patient's frailty and have limited results, as they take little account of the way the institution functions, which is not aimed at prevention of functional decline. The process of care reveals shortcomings: lack of geriatric knowledge, inadequate evaluation and management of functional status. The group suggests that interventions must not only identify at-risk patients so that they may benefit from specialized management, but they must also target the hospital structure and the process of care. This requires a graded "quality approach" and rethinking of the organization of the hospital around the elderly person.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingFrail ElderlyHospitalizationPersons with DisabilitiesAgedDelivery of Health CareGeriatric AssessmentHospitalsHumansIatrogenic DiseaseMonacoSeverity of Illness IndexTerminology as Topic

Identifiers

PMID21968859
PMCPMC12878894
OpenAlexW2052437243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.